Re: Installing our CLI DLLs on Windows XP SP3 with .NET 2.0 and 3.5 (but no newer) fails

2012-12-10 Thread Andras Timar
Hi Tor, On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote: This is probably nothing new, but something I just recently became aware of, using my build from the libreoffice-4-0 branch. I am not sure if I have interpreted my testing correctly, please discuss. You probably built

Re: Installing our CLI DLLs on Windows XP SP3 with .NET 2.0 and 3.5 (but no newer) fails

2012-12-10 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Not trying to butt in here, but doesnt windows update usually ask you to install the latest version of the .NET stuff anyway? On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tor, On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote: This is probably

Re: Installing our CLI DLLs on Windows XP SP3 with .NET 2.0 and 3.5 (but no newer) fails

2012-12-10 Thread Németh László
Hi, I have ran into this problem. http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15t=32902 suggests to install .NET 4, but its full installation (+40 MB) needs internet connection under Windows, too. Unfortunatelly, my old, but safe Windows XP machine has no internet connection. Best

Re: Installing our CLI DLLs on Windows XP SP3 with .NET 2.0 and 3.5 (but no newer) fails

2012-12-10 Thread Tor Lillqvist
You probably built with .NET 4.0 SDK. Well, I tried hard not to, and the versions I see output by the tools don't indicate that 4.0 would be used, but yeah, either I didn't look in the right place or somehow otherwise that crept in. (Also the TDF build of the 4.0.0 beta1 has the same problem.)

Re: Installing our CLI DLLs on Windows XP SP3 with .NET 2.0 and 3.5 (but no newer) fails

2012-12-10 Thread Andras Timar
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote: Either we can bump this (REQUIRED_DOTNET_VERSION) to 4.0.0.0 We could do that, but on the other hand, as you say, given how rarely used the LibreOffice CLI stuff is likely to be anyway, it would be a bit silly to require the

Re: Installing our CLI DLLs on Windows XP SP3 with .NET 2.0 and 3.5 (but no newer) fails

2012-12-10 Thread Tor Lillqvist
It is not a strong requirement. If system does not meet this requirement, then CLI stuff will not be installed (silently). Ah, good, that sounds ideal then! (And finally then we might perhaps get some bug reports about it, why doesn't it work any more in LO 4.0 ;) --tml

Installing our CLI DLLs on Windows XP SP3 with .NET 2.0 and 3.5 (but no newer) fails

2012-12-09 Thread Tor Lillqvist
This is probably nothing new, but something I just recently became aware of, using my build from the libreoffice-4-0 branch. I am not sure if I have interpreted my testing correctly, please discuss. Firstly, a vanilla Windows XP SP3 has no .NET Framework on it. Not even 2.0. That doesn't seem to