Re: InteractiveAugmentedIOException in CUT sc_ucalc

2013-02-13 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 02/09/2013 10:04 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote: Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x76fcaf65 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:63 63 ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory. #0 0x76fcaf65 in __GI_

Re: InteractiveAugmentedIOException in CUT sc_ucalc

2013-02-13 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> so that some catch block that should match doesn't. Isn't one typical problem that two type_infos are compared for equality by comparing the name string pointers instead of comparing the name strings with strcmp? I have seen stuff like that both in the Android and iOS ports, I think. Unfortunate

Re: InteractiveAugmentedIOException in CUT sc_ucalc

2013-02-13 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 02/13/2013 04:46 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: so that some catch block that should match doesn't. Isn't one typical problem that two type_infos are compared for equality by comparing the name string pointers instead of comparing the name strings with strcmp? I have seen stuff like that both in t

Re: InteractiveAugmentedIOException in CUT sc_ucalc

2013-02-15 Thread Henrik /KaarPoSoft
On 02/13/2013 05:41 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 02/13/2013 04:46 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: so that some catch block that should match doesn't. Isn't one typical problem that two type_infos are compared for equality by comparing the name string pointers instead of comparing the name strings w