mith such report is available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/lcov_reports/.
Any comments?
Best regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-code-coverage-tp3994901p4003168.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
libreoffice.org/xref/core/sal/qa/helper/gcov/. Maybe someone
with Linux build environment could check that out and try to generate some
stats.
Best regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-code-coverage-tp3994901p3998038.html
Sent from the De
about this).
It seems quite easy to use for a simple file. Now I don't know how much time
one's must invest for a project like LO.
Julien.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-code-coverage-tp3994901p3994948.html
Sent from the Dev mai
On 11/07/12 17:58, bfo wrote:
> Hi.
> Today I stumbled upon Thunderbird code coverage report
> (http://people.mozilla.org/~jcranmer2/c-ccov/).
> Did anyone make such report for LibreOffice codebase?
no, unfortunately we don't know how the unit test coverage ranks exactly
on a scale from "far too
Hi.
Today I stumbled upon Thunderbird code coverage report
(http://people.mozilla.org/~jcranmer2/c-ccov/).
Did anyone make such report for LibreOffice codebase?
Best regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-code-coverage-tp3994901.html
Sent
