2012.03.22 01:00, Pedro rašė:
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Register mail just took a while.
Which brings us to the original problem: why doesn't it support OpenID from
the beginning?
In a little over a month, AskLibO already has nearly 600 users. How much
clearer does the message need to be?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:44:46PM -0700, Pedro wrote:
I thought it was what WE (you , me, TDF, the LO project,etc) are missing.
That is already perfectly clear -- as you know we already have a bug for that
-- and thus need no repeating. But punching the codeconductor devs for not
having your
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:04:51AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
That is already perfectly clear -- as you know we already have a bug for that
-- and thus need no repeating. But punching the codeconductor devs for not
having your pet feature in a prerelease of their free (as in
is indeed a wiser option from a privacy point of view...
http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/5323/what-are-the-downsides-of-browserid-compared-to-openid-oauth-facebook
Thoughts?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Can you maybe be on the QA call tomorrrow?
I'm afraid not. 15:00 UTC on any weekday is during my work hours.
I will read the minutes later.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus-a-proposal
Hi all,
when the topic of getting testcases for LibreOffice into Ubuntus Checkbox, I
finally got myself a Litmus account. I defered that before as yet another
login I did not want to use. Having a look at it now, I find it quite simple
and useful -- it is very well suited to be the tool to get
On 03/21/2012 02:27 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
when the topic of getting testcases for LibreOffice into Ubuntus Checkbox, I
finally got myself a Litmus account. I defered that before as yet another
login I did not want to use. Having a look at it now, I find it quite simple
and useful -- it is
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:27:20PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
The first and most important one is: it is behind its own login -- and that
prevents the casual bypasser to get involved and interested. IMHO, we
absolutely need to change that. The testcases should be browsable without a
login
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:27:20PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
The first and most important one is: it is behind its own login -- and that
prevents the casual bypasser to get involved and interested. IMHO, we
absolutely need to change that. The testcases should be browsable without a
login
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:45:29AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
But adding it to the easy hacks doesn't it mean that it's off limits to
the usual collaborators
No, it only means that these task do not require a particulary deep knowledge
of some arcane corners of the LibreOffice codebase.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:26:49PM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
For the reference:
* I have a Litmus TODO list at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Litmus_TODO. I'd be glad if you
added bugzilla links and missing entries to it. As I've mentioned
before, it would be really nice to maintain
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
I don't know, but it may not make sense to keep improving Litmus at that
point. After all, if they settled for a rewrite, you just have to expect it
to be so much better than the old tool, right? :)
That might be the case --
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
They already have a staging server, but I cant get into it.
Register mail just took a while. I now can walk around in:
https://caseconductor-dev.allizom.org
Its is all looking very nifty and web-2.0-ish. But unlike Litmus, I
:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus-a-proposal-tp3845560p3847106.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
think
this is important
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Maybe we could even throw a limited amount of dedicated funds in that
direction?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus-a-proposal-tp3845560p3847644.html
Sent from the QA
15 matches
Mail list logo