Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily MAB summary and CCing of MABs (was: MAB/Priority and Severity)

2015-06-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:57:10AM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > What exactly do you mean with review here? I don't think we should spend > too much time on that during the ESC call, but I'd be ok with some "does > anyone see a bug on this list that shouldn't belong there" topic. Yes, the latter is

Re: daily MAB summary and CCing of MABs (was: [Libreoffice-qa] MAB/Priority and Severity)

2015-06-29 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Bjoern, On Monday, 2015-06-29 11:28:02 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > - create a query that show all "priority: highest" bugs that have been touched > in the last 25 hours (daily), 8 days (weekly)[1] > - have a bot send these summaries daily or weekly to the dev-list > - drop the "MABs ar

daily MAB summary and CCing of MABs (was: [Libreoffice-qa] MAB/Priority and Severity)

2015-06-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > This is for the ESC to both be aware of newly marked important bugs -- and > also > to weed out one or another wrongly marked high priority bug. Also, this should > help us keep the total number of high priority bugs both un

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] MAB/Priority and Severity

2015-06-24 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Joel Madero wrote: > On 06/23/2015 12:32 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: >>> So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking >>> out priority/severity_. This means that

Re: MAB/Priority and Severity

2015-06-23 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 31 May 2015 22:14:54 +0200, Joel Madero wrote: Hi All! So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*. I will miss MABs... expecially the fact there were different list for the differen

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] MAB/Priority and Severity

2015-06-23 Thread Joel Madero
On 06/23/2015 12:32 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: >> So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking >> out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*. > I'd like to suggest to add this q

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] MAB/Priority and Severity

2015-06-23 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking > out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*. I'd like to suggest to add this query as a reocurring item for the Robinson and the rest of

Re: MAB/Priority and Severity

2015-05-31 Thread m.a.riosv
Hi, Maybe after update the flowchart, the link could go beside Importance selection. So an easy access is given for everybody. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/MAB-Priority-and-Severity-tp4150125p4150135.html Sent from the Dev mailing list

MAB/Priority and Severity

2015-05-31 Thread Joel Madero
Hi All! So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*. What this mean: 1) If you notice that you lack privileges then just email me and I'll add you to the list (add your bugzilla email account)[1][2] 2) *MAB