Hi,
On Wednesday, 2013-11-13 10:17:04 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> However, a class whose implementation requires multiple thousand
> lines of code is likely asking for some refactoring into more
> manageable pieces anyway.
It would take a real hero to refactor EditEngine, and with super cow
On 11/13/2013 09:34 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
But the main thing that speaks against re-combining source code files
that clearly "belongs" together into one source file is the loss of
(easy) access to version history.
"git-blame -C" can make that a little less painful. And it's always
debatabl
The number of source code lines in a .cxx file is as such not that
relevant a factor determining resources consumed when compiling a
source file. After all, the number of source lines *included* from
headers during the compilation can easily be much more. The complexity
of the code (especially so-c
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Jose Guilherme Vanz
wrote:
> Hi, All!
>
> These days when studying the source code to try solve the #43089 -
> Syntax highlighting for Math. I found 5 source files with the same name
> "impedit.cxx". Like this:
> http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=impedit&pro
Hi, All!
These days when studying the source code to try solve the #43089 -
Syntax highlighting for Math. I found 5 source files with the same name
"impedit.cxx". Like this:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=impedit&project=core&defs=&refs=&path=&hist=
Can we merge theses 5 files to just o