On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:01:51AM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> I have created a debian-sid chroot environment to avoid complaints
> about old libraries from the bibisect versions. For example in
> debian-wheezy (i.e., stable), 43all version latest complains:
The alpha1 bibisect update is alrea
On 10/17/2014 11:13 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
* LibreOffice 4.4 bibisects repo creation (Bjoern)
+ Bjoern creating, but Robinson should take over
+ but has time for that? - bugzilla migration a priority... (Bjoern)
+ Bjoern can do that at the time of the tag, but then is tr
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:47:30AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Would not the best thing to do be to do bibisect builds on the
> release baseline, as is done for the TDF builds? That way, the
> builds should work on as many machines as possible.
As discussed explicitly in the call: I hav
On 10/17/2014 12:12 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Then again, as per:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/HowToBibisect#Manual_setup_.28download_a_tarball.29
there are currently _no_ reports of recent build being not universal.
Fine then. (I've no experience consuming those bibisect rep
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 12:12 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi,
>
> Then again, as per:
>
>
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/HowToBibisect#Manual_setup_.28download_a_tarball.29
>
> there are currently _no_ reports of recent build being not universal.
I have created a debian-sid chroot
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> * Open-source related projects for a local university (Jacobo)
> + ~200-300 hours projects sought
> + ideas appreciated!
> + please send to the ML too :-) (Norbert)
Two ideas from the build system world:
- 1/ Repla
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> + need a bugzilla query for the bugs that have been bisected to a single
> commit (Miklos)
> AI + can do that (Bjoern)
> + we have a keyword "bisected", can use that for those with exact
> commit
>+ don
t: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> * Open-source related projects for a local university (Jacobo)
> + ~200-300 hours projects sought
> + ideas appreciated!
> + please send to the ML too :-) (No
-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Bjoern Michaelsen
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:13 PM
To: Robinson Tryon
Cc: Libreoffice-qa; libreoffice-dev
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> + need a
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> * LibreOffice 4.4 bibisects repo creation (Bjoern)
> + Bjoern creating, but Robinson should take over
> + but has time for that? - bugzilla migration a priority... (Bjoern)
> + Bjoern can do that at the time of th
On 18/10/14 03:23, nicholas ferguson wrote:
> I will also add...that LibreOffice's approach to a complicated build... has
> legs and could be marketed as a buid system for complicated apps, that are
> cross platform. Especially if it removes cygwin from its equation.
How close is this to lilypo
On 10/17/2014 08:29 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
- 1/ Replace all custom shell tooling (sed/grep/gawk/perl horrors) and
consolidate on either native (C/C++) code (see e.g. concat-deps) or _one_
and only one consolidated solution beyond that, likely Python3 (as we are
bundli
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:42:54AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> ...if we also successfully abstract over the differences between
> GNU/cygwin and Windows of all those "very little tools" called from
> make recipes (like moving a file).
Well, I dont think we want to get rid of that on Linux/OSX
> Well, I dont think we want to get rid of that on Linux/OSX where GNU
> coreutils
> is a pretty natural thing to be available there.
s/GNU coreutils/POSIX utilities
After all, who knows what useful extensions (irony) GNU might see fit to
provide in the future, which would then be available on
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:54:48PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> s/GNU coreutils/POSIX utilities
>
> After all, who knows what useful extensions (irony) GNU might see fit to
> provide in the future, which would then be available on (GNU/)Linux only,
> as it isn't unlikeli that Apple wants to stay
On 20/10/14 17:04, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> I was just hesitant to write POSIX as Im pretty sure we are using
> functionality
> beyond that (and that works because a lot of things work on BSD/OSX too that
> arent strictly POSIX). Restricting ourselves to POSIX purity just for the
> standards sak
> Restricting ourselves to POSIX purity just for the
> standards sake, rather than that "it should work on all platforms" seem
> like a
> mostly futile endevour to me.
>
Sure; but let's say so then, "it should work on all platforms", so that we
can reject use of GNU coreutils features that are not
-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of nicholas ferguson
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:39 PM
To: 'Bjoern Michaelsen'; 'Jan Holesovsky'
Cc: 'Libreoffice-qa'; 'libreoffice-dev'
Subject: RE: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16
(1) A LibreOffice
18 matches
Mail list logo
