On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 21:22 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Actually I was talking about SUSE LibreOffice for Windows (which is
> > apparently a one-off unsupported release created for the Intel AppUp
> > store) :)
Nah - SUSE will be maintaining that with our stable release. Though of
cours
Pedro Lino píše v Čt 15. 03. 2012 v 17:40 +:
> Hi Petr, all
>
>
> Please, do not take this that we do not take care about
> openSUSE/SUSE
> users. We do a lot of things for them. It is only about my
> packaging
> work and about that I underestim
On 15.03.2012 20:23, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:04 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
Perhaps, if you mean the whole team. But note that there are some
lunatic guys like me, who are interested in bug-fixing ~completely. ;)
Yep - you're a star ! :-)
*timid smile*
not a bi
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:04:44PM +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> Perhaps, if you mean the whole team. But note that there are some
> lunatic guys like me, who are interested in bug-fixing ~completely.
> ;)
Take a good look at the last slide of:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Special:FilePath
Hi Petr, all
Please, do not take this that we do not take care about openSUSE/SUSE
> users. We do a lot of things for them. It is only about my packaging
> work and about that I underestimated the demand for 3.5.
>
Actually I was talking about SUSE LibreOffice for Windows (which is
apparently a
Pedro Lino píše v Čt 15. 03. 2012 v 12:31 +:
> But SUSE released version 3.4.2 while TDF is already at 3.5.1. Doesn't
> that show a little about the importance of stability? ;)
We have had 3.4.4 in the LibreOffice:Stable project for a long time. I
have just pushed there 3.4.5 which actually ha
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:04 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> Perhaps, if you mean the whole team. But note that there are some
> lunatic guys like me, who are interested in bug-fixing ~completely. ;)
Yep - you're a star ! :-)
Thanks Ivan !
Michael.
--
michael.me.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I understand the straw-man concept
Since that is a common rhetorical tools:
"A straw man is a component of an argument and is an informal fallacy
based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "attack a
straw man" is to
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:55:30PM +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> The problem is that open-source developers cannot be motivated to
> work 80% on bugs and 20% on features.
I dont think that is correct in absolute. I bet there are people out there too,
who like to work on bugfixing. Actually I am pre
On 15.03.2012 16:55, Noel Grandin wrote:
The problem is that open-source developers cannot be motivated to work
80% on bugs and 20% on features.
Perhaps, if you mean the whole team. But note that there are some
lunatic guys like me, who are interested in bug-fixing ~completely. ;)
Ivan
_
On 2012-03-15 14:31, Pedro Lino wrote:
As a general conclusion I think we are all doing the best given the
limited human resources and the scarcity of our most valuable
resource: time!
It is because we do CARE about this project that we complain about the
short testing times AND the regress
Hi Michael, all
I'm looking at another few Windows specific bugs that
> are of interest. Particularly with the new drmemory tool and Jesus'
> windows / debug builds - we should be able to progress here quickly.
> It'd be wonderful if we could get these traces for Windows specific
> bugs.
>
I'm qu
12 matches
Mail list logo
