Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-22 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Sunday 22 of July 2012, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi all, > > currently we again have the problem that we get no current WIN Master > builds on the Tinderbox Server. > > I see some successful builds (?) on > , especially > Win-x86_6, but there

Re: Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-22 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Sunday 22 of July 2012, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> currently we again have the problem that we get no current WIN Master >> builds on the Tinderbox Server. >> >> I see some successful builds (?) on >>

Re: Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-23 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Sunday 22 of July 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > ... but I used a simple grep + > sed to extract INPATH= simpler and most importantly avoid using > 'make' on platform for which that may not resolve to a gnumake. You forgot to tell grep what to grep for, so if anybody has updated after this

Re: Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-23 Thread Michael Stahl
On 22/07/12 16:36, Lubos Lunak wrote: > There was one more thing broken. The recent changes to get dev-install > working changed the package format built in the 'build' target to .zip, so > there was no .msi package to upload. I've reverted that change and moved the > FORCE2ARCHIVE part to dev

Re: Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-23 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Michael, On 2012-07-23 at 12:38 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > >> I added the push of LibO*.zip files in push_nightlies.sh. > > > > Is there any point in uploading a .zip file with a Windows build? > > that's a good question, it depends on what you want to test; > for testing office functiona

Re: Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-23 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Sunday 22 of July 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> ... but I used a simple grep + >> sed to extract INPATH= simpler and most importantly avoid using >> 'make' on platform for which that may not resolve to a gnumake. > > You forgot to tell

Re: Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-23 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 07/23/2012 12:38 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: On 22/07/12 16:36, Lubos Lunak wrote: There was one more thing broken. The recent changes to get dev-install working changed the package format built in the 'build' target to .zip, so there was no .msi package to upload. I've reverted that change an

Re: Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-24 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Monday 23 of July 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > On Sunday 22 of July 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> ... but I used a simple grep + > >> sed to extract INPATH= simpler and most importantly avoid using > >> 'make' on platform for whi

Re: Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Monday 23 of July 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: >> > On Sunday 22 of July 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> ... but I used a simple grep + >> >> sed to extract INPATH= simpler and m

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox nightlies broken (was Re: No Win builds?)

2012-07-23 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Jan Holesovsky schrieb: Adding the QA guys - from my point of view, the nightly should be as close to our 'normal' installation as possible (ie. .msi), so that the QA guys can see installation problems early too. But up to them do decide, I guess. Hi, that all is a little true for particular