On 11/13/2012 07:35 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Roman Eisele wrote:
But there is a problem: at least on a quick check, I get the
impression that LOdev does NOT migrate any settings from the
/LOdev/3/user to the /LOdev/4/user/ profile -- not even the general
settings, like my user name, or the
Roman Eisele píše v Út 13. 11. 2012 v 19:01 +0100:
Am 13.11.12 12:42, schrieb Olivier Hallot:
Hi
Did we address the change in users profile?
$HOME/.libreoffice/3/user/
Thanks
Olivier
Hi Olivier -- a good idea to check this! Yes, the latest master build
for Mac OS X correctly
Am 14.11.2012 13:31, schrieb Petr Mladek:
Roman Eisele pÃÅ¡e v Ãt 13. 11. 2012 v 19:01 +0100:
Am 13.11.12 12:42, schrieb Olivier Hallot:
Hi
Did we address the change in users profile?
$HOME/.libreoffice/3/user/
Thanks
Olivier
Hi Olivier -- a good idea to check this! Yes, the latest master
On 11/14/2012 02:46 PM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:
Am 14.11.2012 13:31, schrieb Petr Mladek:
BTW: It should work on Windows out of box.
I don't think so:
See the discussion of the MIGRATED flag file at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57061#c5.
Stephan
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol píše v St 14. 11. 2012 v 14:46 +0100:
Am 14.11.2012 13:31, schrieb Petr Mladek:
Roman Eisele pÃÅ¡e v Ãt 13. 11. 2012 v 19:01 +0100:
Am 13.11.12 12:42, schrieb Olivier Hallot:
Hi
Did we address the change in users profile?
$HOME/.libreoffice/3/user/
Thanks
Am 12.11.12 12:37, schrieb Petr Mladek:
I have just pushed the version update into master. The upcoming daily
builds should have the version 4.0.
The first build looked fine. Let's see if there is still 3 or 3.7
hidden somewhere.
Thanks! The newest master build for Mac OS X at
However because the personal data folder changed from LOdev\3 to LOdev\4
nothing was imported (and the now useless LOdev\3 folder was left
behind...).
Hi Pedro,
This is not a todo, but might be a bug. Can you please create a Bug report?
Best regards
Rainer
@Rainer
Done ;)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57061
@Michael
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
So - we need to come up with a working migration story there of course.
Quite prolly leaving the 3/ settings around is the right solution anyway
for downgraders; but migrating data to 4/
Am 13.11.12 12:42, schrieb Olivier Hallot:
Hi
Did we address the change in users profile?
$HOME/.libreoffice/3/user/
Thanks
Olivier
Hi Olivier -- a good idea to check this! Yes, the latest master build
for Mac OS X correctly creates the user profile folder at
~/Library/Application
Roman Eisele wrote:
But there is a problem: at least on a quick check, I get the
impression that LOdev does NOT migrate any settings from the
/LOdev/3/user to the /LOdev/4/user/ profile -- not even the general
settings, like my user name, or the selected JRE appear in
/LOdev/4/user/ profile.
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Ne 11. 11. 2012 v 13:19 +0100:
Hi all,
I started http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Todo_rename_3.7_to_4.0
for collection and discussion of all activities related to that decision.
Please feel free to add more action items and / or comments.
Discussion if
Petr Mladek píše v Po 12. 11. 2012 v 09:55 +0100:
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Ne 11. 11. 2012 v 13:19 +0100:
Hi all,
I started http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Todo_rename_3.7_to_4.0
for collection and discussion of all activities related to that decision.
Please feel free to add
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Ne 11. 11. 2012 v 13:19 +0100:
Hi all,
I started http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Todo_rename_3.7_to_4.0
for collection and discussion of all activities related to that decision.
Please feel free to add more action items and / or comments.
Discussion if
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 11:17 -0800, V Stuart Foote wrote:
And in the initial wiki table you included an item:
Someone did - I have no idea where that came from.
So just why is the project moving to a 4.0 build now?
There are a lot of reasons - we need to articulate those
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 13:29 -0800, V Stuart Foote wrote:
So, I don't know for sure, but it sure looks like the release has been made.
How could one find out? Should that be an ODF BOD action?
You could go ask the Apache project :-) Until that code has clear
Apache headers on it, and
Petr Mladek píše v Po 12. 11. 2012 v 09:55 +0100:
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Ne 11. 11. 2012 v 13:19 +0100:
Hi all,
I started http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Todo_rename_3.7_to_4.0
for collection and discussion of all activities related to that decision.
Please feel free to add
Hi all,
I started http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Todo_rename_3.7_to_4.0
for collection and discussion of all activities related to that decision.
Please feel free to add more action items and / or comments.
Discussion if necessary please here in this thread on
Hi all,
I started http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Todo_rename_3.7_to_4.0
for collection and discussion of all activities related to that decision.
Please feel free to add more action items and / or comments.
Discussion if necessary please here in this thread on
Hmm, so looking at Michael's minutes the 8 Nov ESC minutes there was this one
entry regards a 4.0 release.
AA: + bump versions sooner than later, to find hard-coded '3's (Petr)
And in the initial wiki table you included an item:
10 Marketing issues2 We need some explication
Hi *,
when I read Version 4.0 I think there should happen a lot in a program
for a complete new version.
Since many years for Base was discussed, that there has to be a change
in the database of OOo- and LO-Base. But this discussion, if this should
be the newer HSQLDB or anything else, didn't
On 11/11/12 20:59, Robert Großkopf wrote:
Hi *,
when I read Version 4.0 I think there should happen a lot in a program
for a complete new version.
Since many years for Base was discussed, that there has to be a change
in the database of OOo- and LO-Base. But this discussion, if this
Michael,
I have assumed that since the ASF Board has graduated the OpenOffice project
from incubator to an Apache top level project, that all the contributed
code base had been accepted and now falls under ALv2 provision. When I've
looked at the IBM and Oracle contributed source code the
So I was edited out of the 3.7 - 4.0 todo rename matrix. Know it happens,
but thanks Niko only a little harsh...
Here is the item, judge for yourself if it should have come out:
−
| 12
−
| verify consistent ''a11y'' support
−
| 1
−
| QA actions upon implementation of ATK/AT-SPI and
23 matches
Mail list logo