On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 15:13 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
It does indeed... I got thrown-off by the ominous FIXME: linkoo
currently does not work on Mac OS X message at the end :-)
then again there are people that claim linkoo doesn't work on any
platform, because it's broken by design :)
On 19/07/12 00:45, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Windows is a more...challenging creature.
No kidding :-)
But I'm not so much concerned about the git-foo part of the script but
rather with what is put in
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote:
hi Norbert,
it looks like you're living under a rock :)
recently... a fjord actually :-)
on Windows with MSVC make dev-install has been working for several
_days_ now on master (though it is quite slow), and you even
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote:
hi Norbert,
it looks like you're living under a rock :)
recently... a fjord actually :-)
on Windows with MSVC make dev-install has been
On 07/19/2012 11:09 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote:
on Windows with MSVC make dev-install has been working for several
_days_ now on master (though it is quite slow), and you even have a
*/opt/* to add.
Great!
How about Mac ?
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/19/2012 11:09 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote:
on Windows with MSVC make dev-install has been working for several
_days_ now on master (though
On 19/07/12 14:50, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote:
make dev-install works well on Mac anyway, or what am I missing?
It does indeed... I got thrown-off by the ominous FIXME: linkoo
currently does not work on Mac OS X
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my first shot at bibisect integration into
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my first shot at bibisect integration into tinbuild2.
Sorry, I've been afk for some time.. I'll be back soon.
I took a quick
Hi Norbert,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:39:36AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Here's my first shot at bibisect integration into tinbuild2.
Could you look into this? I have never used tinbuild and have no box for
testing it -- still it would be awesome to have this. We could use this on this
one
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my first shot at bibisect integration into tinbuild2.
Sorry, I've been afk for some time.. I'll be back soon.
I took a quick glance, and up front:
+ I'd like not to create a new step for that but to fold it
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll set up a machine as a buildbot so that I can test my changes.
Here's my first shot at bibisect integration into tinbuild2. I threw
together a couple of test files to make it easier to test the bibisect
part
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 03:13:52PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Hmm. The buildbots are spread out in different locations, right? It
seems like the simplest thing would be to push the zipped install up
to the remote (source) server with something fault-tolerant like
rsync, compare a sha1
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
If you commit to a local bibisect repo, and then push to a central one:
- you dont need sha1/rsync whatever because git itself makes sure your data
gets transmitted correctly
- you will save bandwidth
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
Not at all - it is even possible to generate a zipped installation, that
would be just unpacked, and checked into git; ie. nothing really hard to
do. But nobody has done that yet - are you interested?
Has anyone else
Hi,
just to say thanks for bibisect
Impressive example with fdo49610 to find the problematic commit.
Regards
Pierre-André
On 12/09/2011 02:59 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi all,
So I hope with this, we make regression finding some more fun and allow us --
QA and developers together -- to
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:11:48PM +0200, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
just to say thanks for bibisect
Impressive example with fdo49610 to find the problematic commit.
Thanks for the feedback, and also kudos to Florian for actually doing the
bibisect ;)
(An this reminds me that I need to
regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/What-is-bibisect-And-what-is-it-doing-in-my-office-tp3572953p3991323.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice
Hi,
On 2012-06-16 at 02:22 -0700, bfo wrote:
The bibisect is only possible for Bugs which are reproducible under Linux,
if Linux has already been excluded (maybe bug history or comments will
contain required information) bibisecting will not be possible. But of
course, you can use
a hassle (if I
understand correctly it is a manual run exe-check exe-mark source process).
Am I missing something?
Best regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/What-is-bibisect-And-what-is-it-doing-in-my-office-tp3572953p3990429.html
Sent from the Dev
Hi all,
bibisect stands for binary bisect and is intended to help QA for LibreOffice
3.5. Regressions are a most annoying artifact that unfortunately come with
software development and QA. However, regressions are a misfeature we want to
deal with quick and early as they might get harder and
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 14:59 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/bibisect-3.5.lzma
contains:
- 53 complete office installs between the creation of the core repo and the
-3-5 branchoff (thats 5000 commits)
- at 450MB each, that would be ~22GB total
-
On 12/09/2011 02:59 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
(2) Almost: I forgot to disable-oolink, so I had to filter the branch to tweak
the links again. :-/
Note that configure now has --disable-oolink. In case you'll do this
again for 3.5--3.6.
Stephan
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:12:53PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 12/09/2011 02:59 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
(2) Almost: I forgot to disable-oolink, so I had to filter the branch to
tweak
the links again. :-/
Note that configure now has --disable-oolink. In case you'll do
this
Hi Bjoern,
On Friday, 2011-12-09 14:59:53 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
bibisect stands for binary bisect
Way cool!
Eike
--
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 14:59 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
bibisect stands for binary bisect and is intended to help QA for LibreOffice
3.5. Regressions are a most annoying artifact that unfortunately come with
software development and QA.
Wow - I assume this was the cryptic magic
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:47:47PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Wow - I assume this was the cryptic magic item you wanted to discuss
at the TSC next week :-)
Yes. ;)
+ are these binaries 'generic' ? ie. did you build them
on an old enough distribution, with a clean
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:59:53PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
bibisect stands for binary bisect and is intended to help QA for LibreOffice
3.5.
I just elaborated a bit more about this on
http://sweetshark.livejournal.com/7683.html
Best,
Bjoern
http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/bibisect-3.5.lzma
contains:
- 53 complete office installs between the creation of the core repo and the
-3-5 branchoff (thats 5000 commits)
- at 450MB each, that would be ~22GB total
- however, it is only 749MB total download size, thats 15MB per
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:43:11PM +, Pedro Lino wrote:
What do you mean complete office install?
A dev-install with these configure-flags:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/tree/bibisect/build.sh#n34
So no mozilla/binfilter/help/dictionaries, but most bugs
30 matches
Mail list logo
