On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Maybe it is better to just let check target depend on build target ?
In general.
Do you mean making the toplevel targets depend on each other, or also in each
module?
If this is meant to be also for all modules, wouldn't this possibly still
On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Or do people use make check with demand to build only what is
necessary for tests and nothing more ?
Well, make check is for after a successful build to check the result, no?
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:35:27PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Or do people use make check with demand to build only what is
necessary for tests and nothing more ?
Well, make
On 13 April 2012 16:32, Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Maybe it is better to just let check target depend on build target ?
In general.
Do you mean making the toplevel targets depend on each other, or also in each
module?
I mean to add
On Friday 13 of April 2012, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:35:27PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Or do people use make check with demand to build only what is
On Friday 13 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
On 13 April 2012 16:32, Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Maybe it is better to just let check target depend on build target ?
In general.
Do you mean making the toplevel targets depend on
On 13 April 2012 18:38, Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
On Friday 13 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Note that the modules' dependencies (in the sense: first build sal then
cppu) are written in module/prj/build.lst and build.pl reads them.
Does this mean that if there is a build race
Hi all,
On 13 April 2012 18:21, Matúš Kukan matus.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
Bjoern, what do you think about attached patch ?
I left subsequentcheck untouched for now.
Oh no, it won't work in new gbuild world where we can do:
make -rs -j 4 $(WORKDIR)/Module/check/sw
or anything, from clean.
That's
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Maybe it is better to just let check target depend on build target ?
No?
Or do people use make check with demand to build only what is
necessary for tests and nothing more ?
Well, make check is for after a successful build to check
On 12 April 2012 16:14, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thursday, 2012-04-12 13:33:38 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
As far as I can see, it is the i18npool library that dlopens localedata_en
(i18npool/source/localedata/localedata.cxx), so I think the best way to
express this dependency is
10 matches
Mail list logo
