Hi all,
On 13 April 2012 18:21, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Bjoern, what do you think about attached patch ?
> I left subsequentcheck untouched for now.
Oh no, it won't work in new gbuild world where we can do:
make -rs -j 4 $(WORKDIR)/Module/check/sw
or anything, from clean.
That's something as Lubos
On 13 April 2012 18:38, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Friday 13 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
>> Note that the modules' dependencies (in the sense: first build sal then
>> cppu) are written in /prj/build.lst and build.pl reads them.
>
> Does this mean that if there is a build race condition in chec
On Friday 13 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> On 13 April 2012 16:32, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> >> Maybe it is better to just let check target depend on build target ?
> >> In general.
> >
> > Do you mean making the toplevel targets depend on eac
On Friday 13 of April 2012, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:35:27PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> > > > Or do people use make check with demand to build only w
On 13 April 2012 16:32, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
>> Maybe it is better to just let check target depend on build target ?
>> In general.
>
> Do you mean making the toplevel targets depend on each other, or also in each
> module?
I mean to add into gbui
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:35:27PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> > > Or do people use make check with demand to build only what is
> > > necessary for tests and nothing more ?
> >
>
On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> > Or do people use make check with demand to build only what is
> > necessary for tests and nothing more ?
>
> Well, make check is for after a successful build to check the result, n
On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Maybe it is better to just let check target depend on build target ?
> In general.
Do you mean making the toplevel targets depend on each other, or also in each
module?
If this is meant to be also for all modules, wouldn't this possibly still
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Maybe it is better to just let check target depend on build target ?
No?
> Or do people use make check with demand to build only what is
> necessary for tests and nothing more ?
Well, make check is for after a successful build to che
On 12 April 2012 16:14, Eike Rathke wrote:
> On Thursday, 2012-04-12 13:33:38 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>
>> As far as I can see, it is the i18npool library that dlopens localedata_en
>> (i18npool/source/localedata/localedata.cxx), so I think the best way to
>> express this dependency is to make
10 matches
Mail list logo