Hi,
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:08:06PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 07/05/14 14:17, David Tardon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:41:59AM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >> Hi David, *,
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:17 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> >>> If we really want
On 07/05/14 14:17, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:41:59AM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>> Hi David, *,
>>
>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:17 AM, David Tardon wrote:
>>> If we really want to
>>> continue to use this script for signing, IMHO it should be done as a
>>> sep
Hi,
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:41:59AM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi David, *,
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:17 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 02:24:15PM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Andras Timar wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 6,
David Tardon wrote:
> If we really want to continue to use this script for signing, IMHO
> it should be done as a separate step after build.
>
Might be a good idea anyway. Defined point in time when keys are used,
less code involved, etc etc.
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
Hi David, *,
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:17 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 02:24:15PM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Andras Timar wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Mathias MICHEL
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> See https://bugs.freedeskto
Hi,
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 02:24:15PM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Andras Timar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Mathias MICHEL
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315
> >> From the Cloph
Hi *,
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Andras Timar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Mathias MICHEL
> wrote:
>>
>> See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315
>> From the Cloph's comment it seems the issue is fixed but with room for
>> improvement.
The room for improv
Hi,
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Mathias MICHEL
wrote:
> Hello
>
> See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315
> From the Cloph's comment it seems the issue is fixed but with room for
> improvement.
>
> Should we close it or not ?
I'm interested in stability in this area and the cu
Hello
See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315
From the Cloph's comment it seems the issue is fixed but with room for
improvement.
Should we close it or not ?
Kind regards
Mat M
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesk
Hello
See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63315
From the Cloph's comment it seems the issue is fixed but with room for
improvement.
Should we close it or not ?
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists
10 matches
Mail list logo