On 02/15/2013 07:27 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
there is needless complexity added to gbuild by having all those "creative"
library naming schemes. One of them is UNOLIBS_OOO which is just like OOOLIBS,
except that they are named a bit different: libfoo.uno.so instead of
libfoolo.so. On dmake/bu
Hi,
Thank you for your patch! It has been merged to LibreOffice.
If you are interested in details, please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2169
Approvals:
David Ostrovsky: Verified; Looks good to me, approved
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2169
To unsubscribe, vi
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 19:27 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Any objections? Speak up now or be silent ;)
Have some encouragement - I think it's wonderful :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_
Hi,
there is needless complexity added to gbuild by having all those "creative"
library naming schemes. One of them is UNOLIBS_OOO which is just like OOOLIBS,
except that they are named a bit different: libfoo.uno.so instead of
libfoolo.so. On dmake/build.pl and esp. with a dmake/build.pl/gbuild m
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2169
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/69/2169/1
proposal: move towards killing UNOLIBS_OOO and merge libs to OOOLIBS
- this is a partial example commit moving
