https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148116
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148116
--- Comment #5 from Armondo Lopez ---
I was unable to reproduce the same behavior in
Version: 24.2.1.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: db4def46b0453cc22e2d0305797cf981b68ef5ac
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148116
raal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@post.cz
--- Comment #4 from raal
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148116
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148116
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148116
--- Comment #2 from kamal K ---
Following Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open Writer. Go to menu and click tools>options>view.
2. Click on the icon to install extensions in the "icon style" option.
3. Click on button to install "Yaru theme."
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148116
Suthagar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148116
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148116
Bug ID: 148116
Summary: Cannot download/install extensions in Libreoffice
Writer.
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.3.1.3 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64
://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Java-sidebar-extensions-and-LibreOffice-tp4139084p4139813.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Java-sidebar-extensions-and-LibreOffice-tp4139084p4139618.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http
,
xSearchDescriptor);
} /
Any ideas about the reasons of the misbehaviour?
Thanks in advance and best regards
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Java-sidebar-extensions-and-LibreOffice-tp4139084p4139618.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-extensions-and-LibreOffice-tp4139084.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Tor,
On 06/08/13 12:58, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
that means that we need to compile add-ins using the same C++
compiler as the UNO libraries were compiled with. What compiler is
that, in the case of binary releases of LO for Windows?
Visual Studio 2010. Using other Visual
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:29:27PM +1000, John Pye john@anu.edu.au wrote:
Thanks for that. Do you know how often we would need to recompile
extensions for Calc? Every major release, or every minor release, or
less often?
Worst case, every major release (like 4.1 - 4.2).
Does it matter
For the record, I also found this page:
http://help.libreoffice.org/Calc/Add-in_for_Programming_in_Calc
This seems to allude to a much simpler way of writing Calc add-ins, but
it's not clear if this alternative API is really deprecated or not, nor
how it works on Linux (page refers only to
Hi John,
On Tuesday, 2013-08-06 22:49:43 +1000, John Pye wrote:
For the record, I also found this page:
http://help.libreoffice.org/Calc/Add-in_for_Programming_in_Calc
This seems to allude to a much simpler way of writing Calc add-ins,
but it's not clear if this alternative API is really
that means that we need to compile add-ins using the same C++ compiler as
the UNO libraries were compiled with. What compiler is that, in the case of
binary releases of LO for Windows?
Visual Studio 2010. Using other Visual Studio versions (2008, 2012) might
work fine, too.
--tml
--
I need to send the general structure of an extension, that is what I need to
create an extension to any of LibreOffcie aplicacones.
¨´Caminante no hay Camino, se hace camino al andar ¨¨
http://www.uci.cu
___
LibreOffice mailing list
on extensions:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Extensions
regards,
michael
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi *,
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
There is no dominant IDE (much less so a crossplatform one) and there
seems to
be a lot flux on which IDE is the en vouge one each year. Thus aiming to
have
simple, stable and robust build environment that is generic and
independant is
key -- whatever is the
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
As for IDEs: Actually I dont think that many Python stuff is done in
a IDE -- most is simply written in an editor.
I think you are wrong, at least when we're talking about the classic
3rd party mostly-closed-classic-development-shop.
It seems to be a real market -
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Also -- and this is a proposal for the ESC to discuss: I would like
to remove the C++ examples there.
I tried hard to make them work and just couldnt get them to build
(trying it on Windows, just to make things more interesting).
I don't think this is quite the
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:56:46AM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I don't think this is quite the message I want to convey to the
ecosystem.
Then someone needs to fix the examples. As that did not happen dispite it
being a well-known issue, it makes little sense to wait for a miracle any
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
As for IDEs: Actually I dont think that many Python stuff is done in
a IDE -- most is simply written in an editor.
I think you are wrong, at least when we're talking about the classic
3rd party
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 12:20 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
As much as it it is perverted, I would prefer people to bind their backend
Lets discuss this on Thursday in the ESC call :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
As for IDEs: Actually I dont think that many Python stuff is done in
a IDE -- most is simply written in an editor.
and:
There is no dominant IDE (much less so a crossplatform one) and
there seems to be a lot flux on which IDE is the en
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 06:43:27AM -0400, Dan Lewis wrote:
What is the purpose of this extension? Why print only on Tuesdays?
The real purpose of this extension is to be an example on how to write a simple
extension:
https://plus.google.com/101094190333184858950/posts/dpLf3s6C2r5
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 11:33 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Also -- and this is a proposal for the ESC to discuss: I would like to remove
the C++ examples there. Im not kidding, April fools is over in my time zone.
I tried hard to make them work and just couldnt get them to build (trying it
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:47:18AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
IMHO what would be needed:
* make uno-skeletonmaker generate python code skeleton
* add python support to ooeclipse using pydev (or add UNO support to a
python IDE)
I see both not being that essential, to be honest:
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 07:11 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 02/06/2013 04:56 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Adding the features you need to the core, so everyone can enjoy them
out of the box is almost certainly the best way to achieve your goals -
and (after all) C++ is not so
31 matches
Mail list logo
