Hi Dan,
On Tuesday, 2023-09-05 18:53:37 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> seems the recent change [1] to KahanSum handling causes a test failure
> on ppc64le.
That should be fixed now with
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156899
and cherry-picks are pending for 7-6, 7-5 and 7-5-8.
Unfortunately
On 9/13/23 13:58, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Wednesday, 2023-09-13 13:45:36 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
It would be worth a try to simply call executeFast() only if SC_USE_SSE2
is defined, so the failing platforms skip executeUnrolled(), here
Hi Dan,
On Wednesday, 2023-09-13 13:45:36 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > It would be worth a try to simply call executeFast() only if SC_USE_SSE2
> > is defined, so the failing platforms skip executeUnrolled(), here
> >
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:06:10 +0200
Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, 2023-09-07 11:36:33 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On 9/7/23 08:25, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:16:28 +0200
> > > Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On 9/5/23 18:53, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > > >
Hi,
On Thursday, 2023-09-07 11:36:33 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 9/7/23 08:25, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:16:28 +0200
> > Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > > On 9/5/23 18:53, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > > seems the recent change [1] to KahanSum handling causes a test failure
> > >
On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 11:36:33 +0200
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 9/7/23 08:25, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:16:28 +0200
> > Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> >> On 9/5/23 18:53, Dan Horák wrote:
> >>> seems the recent change [1] to KahanSum handling causes a test failure
> >>> on ppc64le.
>
On 9/7/23 08:25, Dan Horák wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:16:28 +0200
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 9/5/23 18:53, Dan Horák wrote:
seems the recent change [1] to KahanSum handling causes a test failure
on ppc64le.
Running scope as unit:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:32:49 +0200
Xisco Fauli wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> That test is indeed testing the patch you are reverting, so it's
> expected to fail. It shouldn't fail if you also revert
> 2ac7d339a97efa638124c2862551e0876487833b.
thanks, it makes sense (and helps) :-)
On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:16:28 +0200
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 9/5/23 18:53, Dan Horák wrote:
> > seems the recent change [1] to KahanSum handling causes a test failure
> > on ppc64le.
> >
> > Running scope as unit:
> >
On 9/5/23 18:53, Dan Horák wrote:
seems the recent change [1] to KahanSum handling causes a test failure
on ppc64le.
Running scope as unit:
-home-sharkcz-projects-libreoffice-workdir-CppunitTest-sc_statistical_functions_test.test:20230905152639:2378561.scope
[_RUN_]
Hello Dan,
That test is indeed testing the patch you are reverting, so it's
expected to fail. It shouldn't fail if you also revert
2ac7d339a97efa638124c2862551e0876487833b.
On 6/9/23 15:41, Dan Horák wrote:
On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 18:53:37 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
Hello,
seems the recent
On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 18:53:37 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> Hello,
>
> seems the recent change [1] to KahanSum handling causes a test failure
> on ppc64le.
>
> [1]
> https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/1f8cc7644293e62ad6430bbeec243d3283e478d7
and with the change reverted I am getting a failure in
Hello,
seems the recent change [1] to KahanSum handling causes a test failure
on ppc64le.
Running scope as unit:
-home-sharkcz-projects-libreoffice-workdir-CppunitTest-sc_statistical_functions_test.test:20230905152639:2378561.scope
[_RUN_]
13 matches
Mail list logo