Hi Miklos,
On Friday, 2013-02-15 11:05:37 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 02:43:16PM +, Caolán McNamara
> wrote:
> > My best theory is that it was intended to speed up builds by having less
> > "stuff" in the headers for compilers to parse by having the preprocessor
> >
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 02:43:16PM +, Caolán McNamara
wrote:
> My best theory is that it was intended to speed up builds by having less
> "stuff" in the headers for compilers to parse by having the preprocessor
> strip out the stuff includers didn't need to see. Which would suggest
> that it
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 12:16 -0200, Rodolfo wrote:
> While working on a patch, I saw this #define inside a .cxx file... [1]
>
> Some (private) methods of class Ruler are declared inside an #ifdef of
> it [2]. But that can be only triggered inside ruler.cxx file [1] : a
> trick by defining _SV_RULER
While working on a patch, I saw this #define inside a .cxx file... [1]
Some (private) methods of class Ruler are declared inside an #ifdef of
it [2]. But that can be only triggered inside ruler.cxx file [1] : a
trick by defining _SV_RULER_CXX right before including the header
file.
Is it really n
