Re: when is not a Build-ID?

Hi, 2016-12-05 11:22 GMT+02:00 Samuel Mehrbrodt : > please see http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/configure.ac#2160 - the build ID can be passed as a configure parameter, so it is optional. That's not a bug. Thank you a lot. I understand that it needs to be played

Re: when is not a Build-ID?

Hi Lera, please see http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/configure.ac#2160 - the build ID can be passed as a configure parameter, so it is optional. That's not a bug. Regards Samuel Am 02.12.2016 um 14:28 schrieb Lera Goncharuk: Hi all, I prepare a patch to core with documentation on

Re: when is not a Build-ID?

Hi. > Could anybody explain me, please, when it can take place, and why > it is such critical for this patch? I suppose you refer to "Please use %PRODUCTNAME instead of "LibreOffice" and replace it afterwards. See e.g. “ I cannot see the word BUILD-ID. We use %PRODUCTNAME instead of

when is not a Build-ID?

Hi all, I prepare a patch to core with documentation on arguments of soffice. https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/31244/ Samuel Mehrbrodt leaves a comment, about it. I am not programmer for LO, I make patches with the documentation. For me, if build-ID is not, it is the bug. Could anybody explain