[Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, I wanted to prepare the freebsd port for libreoffice 3.4 beta1, but I can find the distfile for libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 on the mirrors, it is missing or I missed something and it is not needed anymore? regards, Bapt ___ LibreOffice mailing

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Júlio, On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:49:57 -0300 Júlio Hoffimann julio.hoffim...@gmail.com wrote: The gradual migration is the only way i see to change thousand of names. Even with regular expressions, the task is not easy to do. There are feature branches. Absolutely no need to do this on

Re: [Libreoffice] OSL_ASSERT - remove backtrace or make abort

2011-04-20 Thread Tor Lillqvist
I fully agree. We need to make it clear what assertions really mean, and how they should be used. Currently it is somewhat of a disaster area. There are places in the code that cause assertion failures every time the code is run if built with debug=t. So does that then mean that the code is

Re: [Libreoffice] GSoC, help conversion

2011-04-20 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hallo Timo, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 01:57 +0200, Timo wrote: do you have questions or comments about my project proposal*? This week I am available until Thursday evening (UTC). Let the comments happen in the proposal's comments. Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:10:25 + schrieb Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org: Hi, I wanted to prepare the freebsd port for libreoffice 3.4 beta1, but I can find the distfile for libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 on the mirrors, it is missing or I missed something and it is not needed

Re: [Libreoffice] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-20 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Vu Hung, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 00:26 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) wrote: As for the regulation of MHST, I propose that I will firstly register LibO team as a mentor; and I will take care of the Vietnam side. Could you enlighten us about some points about MHST? Is it working exactly like

[Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Becker
Robert, my patch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4id=6c3539d8e1dbad13264b862e1344e3c3a8690dec your patch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?id=2b03888a918b7020a1f9330686dc531222057573 as far as i saw the reason to use an absolute

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] remove String with OUString

2011-04-20 Thread Noel Power
On 19/04/11 22:09, Caolán McNamara wrote: You*did* run the smoketest didn't you. I'm sure you did. you *are* joking right? such confidence in me doing the right thing is completely misplaced, I am ashamed I didn't run it :-( I did some touch testing with basic but I have to admit running

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] remove String with OUString

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:22:46 +0100 Noel Power nopo...@novell.com wrote: On 19/04/11 22:09, Caolán McNamara wrote: You*did* run the smoketest didn't you. I'm sure you did. you *are* joking right? such confidence in me doing the right thing is completely misplaced, I am ashamed I didn't

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-04-20 09:52), Andreas Becker wrote: Robert, my patch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4id=6c3539d8e1dbad13264b862e1344e3c3a8690dec your patch:

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Andreas, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 09:52 +0200, Andreas Becker wrote: Really not. The reason is, that the old version does not always work: For me, print(distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('VERSION')); prints 3.2, but the library is libpython3.2mu.so. .. The absolute path in my patch is

[Libreoffice] Git Artwork guide

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi designers, Hi developers, following the discussion on: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/756895 I created a short tutorial for designers on how to get setup to contribute artwork directly to the project at without a complete build:

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:42:31 +0200 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: ... (make DESTDIR=... install is broken for me). Hi all, I would recommend my patch attached. For that one would need to pass '--libdir=/usr/LIBDIR' to configure to behave. Otherwise it installs to /LIBDIR. Improvements to

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] An updated Autolayout patch

2011-04-20 Thread cocofan
This is another updated set of Autolayout patches. I think I managed to get the custom layout to work but sometimes there is a segmentation fault connected with using a literal string (will investigate later). The reading and writing to the xml file doesn't work right so it has been disabled

Re: [Libreoffice] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 07:42 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) wrote: The reason we have our own version of Gsoc in Vietnam is that students' English skill is not so good. Ho hum :-) I'd feel a lot better if you guys worked with Google to translate task specifications to Vietnamese and stuck

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-04-20 10:14), Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Andreas, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 09:52 +0200, Andreas Becker wrote: Really not. The reason is, that the old version does not always work: For me, print(distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('VERSION')); prints 3.2, but the library is

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-20 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Samphan Raruenrom samp...@osdev.co.th wrote: Firefox - Tinderboxpushlog : http://tbpl.mozilla.org/ Doing it this was is near impossible, as the repository is split into multiple ones. Building LibreOffice from master or 3.4 branch is hard for beginners because

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36404 --- Comment #29 from

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36285, which changed state. Bug 36285 Summary: LibO 3.4 beta1 – No available language modules, spell check is impossible https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36285 What|Old Value

[Libreoffice] Summary: LibreOffice TSC call - Thur Apr 14th - 16:00 UTC

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, sorry for the late post, here a short summary of the last TSC call: attendants: Kohei, Petr, Kendy, Norbert, David, Fridrich, Cedric, Bjoern 3.4 status (Petr): - beta-1 upload should give us a better picture where we are by user feedback - beta-2 and further steps should

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
Better diff (note that this still requires a shared library and will not work static ones): diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 470aa39..0d06542 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -4108,11 +4108,11 @@ elif test -n $with_system_python -o -n $with_system_libs \

[Libreoffice] make install broken?

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:25:39 +0200 schrieb Hanno Meyer-Thurow h@web.de: On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:42:31 +0200 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: ... (make DESTDIR=... install is broken for me). Hi all, I would recommend my patch attached. For that one would need to pass

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
After discussing this with Michael it seems the best solution would be to use python-config, it even makes configure.in smaller ;) Please test it with python3 too. diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 470aa39..4dd7a4e 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -4107,12 +4107,9 @@

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Samphan, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 12:09 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: Building LibreOffice from master or 3.4 branch is hard for beginners because we don't know which point in time that the branch are buildable on one's platform. Yes - this is bad; Caolan's idea was to have tags for

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-20 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Thank you all for the replies, was a great discussion. :-) I won't persist in this idea, even discording in the actual situation. Let's go back for coding... $ cd libo/wizards/com/sun/star/wizards :-( Regards, Júlio. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello all, After finding in the history, I found that this line was IMHO accidentally deleted.

Re: [Libreoffice] If you got bounce notification, all is fine again

2011-04-20 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Thanks for your answer :) Best Regards -- Korrawit Pruegsanusak On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 20:10, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote: Hi Korrawit, We ban spammers from time to time manually; the ideal solution would mean updates in the freedesktop.org infrastructure, I am afraid. Regards,

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-20 Thread Samphan Raruenrom
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Samphan Raruenrom samp...@osdev.co.th wrote: Firefox - Tinderboxpushlog : http://tbpl.mozilla.org/ Doing it this was is near impossible, as the repository is

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Hanno Meyer-Thurow píše v St 20. 04. 2011 v 11:25 +0200: On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:42:31 +0200 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: ... (make DESTDIR=... install is broken for me). Hi all, I would recommend my patch attached. For that one would need to pass '--libdir=/usr/LIBDIR' to

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Robert, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 00:44 +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote: Last week, my answer was no. But this evening, after many printf, it's yes I've a patch who fixe this bug ;-) Nice ! :-) It's very strange than this line was deleted ! I try to find the origine of this delete with

[Libreoffice] consistent namespaces future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 23:17 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: IMHO doing a gradual migration is not a good idea here. Such things should be done in one deep cut, because: So - I think the tread came up with the right answer - which is 'later'; on this. Nevertheless, the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello all May we close this fdo#36399 bug then? Best Regards -- Korrawit Pruegsanusak On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 20:44, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Hi Robert, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 00:44 +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote: Last week, my answer was no. But this evening, after many

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:43:07 +0200 Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote: I did some changes. I made the libreoffice dirname configurable by --with-install-dirname option. Also I defined prefix, exec_prefix, libdir values in Makefile.in. The result is that the installation path is

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 21:04 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: May we close this fdo#36399 bug then? Indeedie - always worth closing it if it got fixed; I just did that myself :-) Thanks guys, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer,

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag created (3.4.0-beta2)

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Út 19. 04. 2011 v 19:27 +0200: Hi, I have just created the libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag for 3.4.0-beta2 release. We are sorry but some wrong strings caused build breakage for some localizations. You might want to use the tag libreoffice-3.3.99.2-hotfix1 from the translations

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] letter wizard template files packed and installed in two copies fdo#35722

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 22:22 +0200, Andras Timar wrote: Windows installer size could be further reduced, if letter wizard template files would not be packed in two copies for 26 languages. Nice - fixes 35722 and shrinks our installer :-) presumably (as l10n guru) you're happy that there

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-20 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: [how to tell what revisions are buildable]        Beyond that - what you could easily do - is to help out by hacking some support into 'g' to download a set of revisions in a text file (one per module) and

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Michael, Hi all, On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:02:06 +0100 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Having said that - I think we probably want to have a flag-day at some stage perhaps a 4.0, and it is worth collecting things we want to do then, so we remember to do them all - I suggest

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Dargaud
After a long reflection, I confirm that this gigantesque contribution is under LGPLv3+/MPL Bob Le 20/04/11 16:20, Michael Meeks a écrit : On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 00:44 +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote: And I've found a missing returnVal = sal_True; in salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx Nice work -

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Hanno Meyer-Thurow píše v St 20. 04. 2011 v 16:08 +0200: On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:43:07 +0200 Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote: I did some changes. I made the libreoffice dirname configurable by --with-install-dirname option. Also I defined prefix, exec_prefix, libdir values in

Re: [Libreoffice] complete

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Timo, On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 17:50 +0200, Timo wrote: Maybe this task should be moved to “completed”? http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Easy_Hacks#Make_python_.2F_mail-merge_debuggable I read your last mail, and I was not certain that it is working :-) so sadly the code didn't get

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Michael, Thanks for expose your opinion, it's so much professional than mine. :-) Best regards, Júlio. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag created (3.4.0-beta2)

2011-04-20 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 07:27:51PM +0200, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote: The build repo is not tagged. We would like to get rid of it. Hi Petr, One question: the old build repo created .txt filelists in the build/ directory which helped creating subpackages: we could just read

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Wednesday 20 of April 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: And of course, we should extend the above list to cover all our pet hates that we can't currently fix IMHO. I don't want to comment on the specific items as that could make this thread grow into a monster, but could it be said more

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 16:43 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Hi Michael, Hi all, On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:02:06 +0100 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Having said that - I think we probably want to have a flag-day at some stage perhaps a 4.0, and it is worth collecting

Re: [Libreoffice] release plan : inconsistency between 3.3.3 and 3.4

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Pierre, On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 21:45 +0200, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: jumping late into the subject, but :-) On 04/11/2011 12:25 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: The plan is (of course), to keep releasing 3.3.x releases as long as people are interested in creating them I

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Radke
Thanks for your work but I'm running into a permission issue: == Entering fakeroot environment... == Starting package_libreoffice()... Installing in /usr/lib/libreoffice... mkdir /usr/lib/libreoffice: Permission denied at /build/src/build/solenv/bin/ooinstall line 32 make: *** [install] Error

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Lubos, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 17:08 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: I don't want to comment on the specific items as that could make this thread grow into a monster, but could it be said more specifically what we cannot fix currently ? :-) from 10k feet anything in clone/ure/ is the

Re: [Libreoffice] PyUno is Python 3 compatible

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Becker
Hi Hanno, First of all, it has nothing to do with that patch. In configure.in, AM_PATH_PYTHON([2.2]) check is done. You can look into aclocal.m4 line 205 ff. and try to debug. You should perhaps update automake (my version is 1.11). Maybe is works when you set $PYTHON=python before running

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi Michael, Does it provide user interface for LO to create such smart arts? Where is the current code, branch? Best regards, KAMI 2011/4/20 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com Hi Kami, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 17:14 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: We are very excited about the

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag created (3.4.0-beta2)

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Miklos Vajna píše v St 20. 04. 2011 v 17:00 +0200: On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 07:27:51PM +0200, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote: The build repo is not tagged. We would like to get rid of it. Hi Petr, One question: the old build repo created .txt filelists in the build/ directory which

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:35:47 +0200 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: This has not happened when using plain beta1 source and using make OODESTDIR=foo install. The only thing changed there was OODESTDIR to DESTDIR. So it should stay in the sandbox. Would you mind to pastebin the log of the

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread Thorsten Behrens
KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: We are very excited about the possibilities of LibreOffice, so we decided to try to rewrite Diagram extension [1] in C as a separated module. Are there any ongoing development to create SmartArt related thing? Maybe the best would be to as like the Chart2 module. But we

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi Thorsten, Michael, As we discussed before, java is not preferred around LibreOffice. That is why we decided to check the possible ways. However we have a never (interm) release with more diagrams, possibilities like converting between diagrams, etc. What do you think about? I hope we can gang

Re: [Libreoffice] First attempt to build LO3.4

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 17:06 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: So I should create option like --enable-oxygenoffice, and add my stuffs here ? All things depending in the code directly ? I couldn't see my reply elsewhere. But I would add an OxygenOffice distro config in

Re: [Libreoffice] When can we import xml data

2011-04-20 Thread Fernand Vanrie
Hi Michael , Thanks for your interest, With xml-data i mean a data-dump from a SQL database. Where records becomes rows and fields becomes columbs. MS Exel can flawless open this xml-files. The xml structure depends on the Table of the database but mostly its something like: ?xml

Re: [Libreoffice] OSL_ASSERT - remove backtrace or make abort

2011-04-20 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Lubos Lunak wrote: I'd like to remove the backtrace printing from OSL_ASSERT and friends, or, even better and if possible, make these functions work properly, i.e. abort on failure (I'm not really holding my breath on the second one, but refusing that one will at least support the first

Re: [Libreoffice] When can we import xml data

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Fernand, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 18:43 +0200, Fernand Vanrie wrote: Thanks for your interest, With xml-data i mean a data-dump from a SQL database. Fine - so please open the bug as requested: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ And please provide a sample XML document, and

Re: [Libreoffice] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-20 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
Hello, I CC'ed Nguyen Hong Quang, the one who has founded MHST. (2011/04/20 14:47), Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Could you enlighten us about some points about MHST? Perhaps Mr. Quang can do that better than me :) Is it working exactly like GSoc (1 student, 1 project, one potential winner) or is

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:41:16 +0100 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: :-) from 10k feet anything in clone/ure/ is the public ABI/API. Including the sometimes very creative library naming. That includes some monumental performance blunders - such as the 'store' code,

[Libreoffice] Cleaning sal/inc/osl/file.hxx

2011-04-20 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, after removing all redundant #defines from file.hxx (last change not yet pushed - build is going on) I had a look at the enum RC. At a first glance it seems that e.g. E_None is used only in pyuno_module.cxx (and in some comments in file.hxx) and could be replaced by the value

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, KAMI911 KAMI911 kami...@gmail.com wrote: As we discussed before, java is not preferred around LibreOffice. That's true for core functionality, but java-extensions are perfectly fine... ciao Christian ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-design] Git Artwork guide

2011-04-20 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Björn, this is just amazing - thanks! After giving it an initial try a few months ago, I never spend more time to explore Git a bit further ... And also a big thank you to Thorsten who already added his great icon workflow :-) Am Mittwoch, den 20.04.2011, 11:12 +0200 schrieb Bjoern

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Re: complete

2011-04-20 Thread Timo
Hi, I don´t know where the master is and how the scp2-directory works. Here is a diff from debians mailmerge.py. mailmerge.py.diff is licensed under LGPLv3+. The license text for MsgBox is inside the file. Within debian libreoffice obviously never uses the built in python. Note that now python

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Kami, all! Am Mittwoch, den 20.04.2011, 17:14 +0200 schrieb KAMI911 KAMI911: Hi Fellowship of Programmers, ??? :-) We are very excited about the possibilities of LibreOffice, so we decided to try to rewrite Diagram extension [1] in C as a separated module. Are there any ongoing

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix fdo#bug 36404 -More than one text cursor at the same time in textfields

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Dargaud
Hi All, In cursor.cxx I found 2 lines accidentally deleted by this patch it seems : vcl119: #i80730# fix cursor paint behavior and timer I've tried to find an explication of this deleted ligne, but without Timer.Stop() I don't understand how it can work correctly. I'm not sure of that. It's

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Dargaud
Hi Michael, Le 20/04/11 15:44, Michael Meeks a écrit : [...] It's very strange than this line was deleted ! I try to find the origine of this delete with qgit and gitk. But I can't find it ! It seems you found it, and it was an error; nice work. Yes, I found the patch, but not the