Hi Greg,
On 04/06/2011 03:15, Greg Stein wrote:
Hi all,
I imagine you've all heard about the proposal[1] to contribute OO.o to
the Apache Software Foundation. I've been involved with Apache for
well over a decade, on its Board of Directors since 2001, its current
Vice Chairman, the VP of Apache
2011/6/4 Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org:
As if understanding and using the old OOo build mechanisms which have been
somewhat adapted at LO wasn't hard enough.
As a user (with just a tiny contribution) I really wish that OO.o
would just die already.
It is not just that the current community
On 04.06.2011 6:06, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
Among
other requirements, the podling project has to review the copyright history
of all code to ensure it has a clean title and is or can be licensed under
the Apache License.
A lurker is speaking here.
AFAIU, one of the reasons why Go-Openoffice
Hello all,
After I've quick checked two attached patches in fdo#33424,
I found that those *refined* patches are committed,
so I marked the bug as fixed.
Anyway, there are some tiny parts that aren't committed yet,
which I don't know whether they're accidentally slipped, or
intentionally dropped.
Hi Developers,
I pushed two patches to master. If you agree please cherry-pick into 3-4 too.
First one is related to templates and common (language independent)
folder is introduced
move default language independent layout templates - master
Hi William, *,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:07 PM, William Lachance wrl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
This does
Allen Pulsifer wrote:
Critically, at this stage in the process, everyone has a free pass to get
involved.
Hi Allen, I don't like free passes so much ...
Normally, once the project is up and running, you would have to
demonstrate your merit before you can join the project. But for
the next
If I understand correctly:
What is developed by the Apache license can be used at LibreOffice but
what is done by LibreOffice
can not be used by OpenOffice as OpenOffice would move to offer the
principles of under the GPL.
I'm not sure this is entirely correct. TDF allowed itself some license
Hello All,
I'm going to try to address as many of the concerns raised as I can in one
email.
I'm not suggesting that anyone go work for IBM. In fact, I'm suggesting
just the opposite; I'm suggesting that we all work together to get IBM
working for us.
Here's the deal. IBM is the main
Hi,
This patch removes dbtoken.hxx in calc/sc which doesn't seem to be used
anywhere. At least libreoffice compiles fine after the file is removed.
Jacek
From 90f8acc4777ffa4643ae0068d936e187d0d4069d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacek Wolszczak shutdownrun...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011
Allen Pulsifer wrote:
But the time to jump in is now. We can't wait.
What is that nonsense?! I can start contributing to Apache anytime I
want - and it's not that the initial committers have *any* exclusive
right on anything.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpY7ICP7LI9V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Christian,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
not properly passing the correct CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS to raptor's
configure. If no one knows why this might be offhand, I can always dig
deeper.
Again, I think the problem is
Hi William, *,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:01 PM, William Lachance wrl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-extern/commit/?id=4a97a447960d97441d2e151f8ed10ccc4a1b8431
Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
make any derivative work, you need to make those changes available to the
rest,
Hi Jacek,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Jacek Wolszczak
shutdownrun...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch removes dbtoken.hxx in calc/sc which doesn't seem to be used
anywhere. At least libreoffice compiles fine after the file is removed.
Thanks, pushed.
ciao
Christian
Allen,
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 22:06 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
So here is my suggestion: I propose the everyone here head over to the
Apache Incubator and join the proposal as an initial member.
Just so you know, I've been following that thread on the Apache list by
reading the archives,
Hello Kohei,
Thank you for your reply. I can certainly understand your sentiment, and I
completely respect it.
Just to clarify one thing:
Suggesting that we somehow owe anything to them just because of the past
is,
to put it mildly insane, and in some way insulting.
I certainly never made
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:59, Rafael Dominguez venccsra...@gmail.com wrote:
Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
Hi Allen,
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 09:08 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
If we wait however, we risk being locked out.
That is what Rob's blog tries to imply. My conversations with various
key Apache leaders suggest that, on the contrary, their governance will
-never- lock people out; it is
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we say MPLv2 and LGPLv3+ - that is fine; and the
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice)
Hey guys
I am working with 2 other great individuals in regards to bring LO to
android devices. The sdk has support for android version 1.5 all the way
up to the latest 3.1
Question becomes what versions do we want to get cross compilation to
work with?
Hi Greg,
First - welcome to the list :-) we appreciate more hackers taking an
interest in LibreOffice of course and really good to have you here.
Patches most welcome too BTW :-)
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 00:21 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
Sure... I can also answer questions, and would be more
Hi Michael,
Now, I think I have a very little knowledge of how things work in KCachegrind.
And I started to doubt if it is possible to do what I thought should
be done. (maybe everything is possible but it may be too complicated)
I thought to hide a library we must:
- all it's functions mark as
Hi Korrawit.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:09, Korrawit Pruegsanusak
detective.conan.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
After I've quick checked two attached patches in fdo#33424,
I found that those *refined* patches are committed,
so I marked the bug as fixed.
Anyway, there are some tiny parts
Le 2011-06-04 12:11, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #133 from tommy27 ba...@quipo.it 2011-06-04 13:20:13 PDT ---
I suggest adding this https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37516 and
fixing if in 3.4.1 release
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #134 from Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@orange.fr 2011-06-04
13:36:56 PDT ---
I nominate bug 37930 : it is a crash with the filepicker of Seven/Vista when
you insert an hyperlink.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36301, which changed state.
Bug 36301 Summary: Crash on exit from LibreOffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36301
What|Old Value |New Value
Hi Allen, *,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Allen Pulsifer pulsi...@openoffice.org wrote:
[...]
I don't know what vision IBM has for the project. I don't know what code
contribution they are going to make--I'm certain they will make some, but I
don't know what they will be. I don't know
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36301, which changed state.
Bug 36301 Summary: Crash on exit from LibreOffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36301
What|Old Value |New Value
Hello,
Here is the part of code :
if( m_eRefType == enumXFBookmarkNone )
return;
else if( m_eRefType == enumXFBookmarkPage )// -- Line 75
{
pAttrList-AddAttribute( A2OUSTR(text:reference-format),
A2OUSTR(page) );
pAttrList-AddAttribute(
Hello Kohei, all,
I've been looking a bit further into the performance problem when dealing
with several sheets and am now at the move method.(ScDocument::MoveTab)
We have there an ScProgress(for all: it's the calc version of a progress
bar) which is called quite too often. We call for every
Hi
Just a simple question on adding new math symbols to LO Math.
In a recent post in the info list, a professor asked to add the symbol
∄
non exist
Unicode symbol: U+2204 THERE DOES NOT EXIST ∄
to Math elements windows.
However, it looks like Math formulas are based on MathML 2.0
The ODF 1.1 OASIS Standard and the ODF 1.2 Committee Specification 01 support
MathML 2.0. There are fonts available in LibreOffice that have the symbol, so
I don't think there is an issue with ODF. It may be an issue with MathML 2.0
though. You may have to settle for neg exists X which is
35 matches
Mail list logo
