Petr,
I did not patch most of the script in bin/. some of them still have
references to /clone and/or 'bootstrap' so it is very likely that they
will need tweaking.
Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Just out of curiosity those of us that have clones using the old build
system will need to re clone correct?
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Jonathan,
On Sunday, 2011-08-07 08:38:10 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Just out of curiosity those of us that have clones using the old
build system will need to re clone correct?
Yes.
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
Key ID:
Hi Maciej,
On Saturday, 2011-08-06 19:59:40 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
DBG_ASSERT( bFound, Key not found );
-aDelList.Remove( nAt );
+aDelList.erase( nAt );
Hmm.. I'd say the original code was wrong, when nAddKey was not found
in
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:19:49PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 12:07 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
A two-day-old clone of branch libreoffice-3-4 fails to build module
sal with dblevel=2, unittest fails: osl_old_test_file.cxx assertion
#failure 1.1: the failure is
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:59:36PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:47 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I generated it against libreoffice-3-4, but it should apply cleanly
against master, too.
Looks sane to me, pushed.
Confirm patch is under LGPLv3+/MPL1.1 ?, can do a
Hi,
I'm trying to build with --enable-werror, in svtools I get
/lo/core/svtools/source/misc/templatefoldercache.cxx: In member function ‘bool
svt::TemplateContentEqual::operator()(const
rtl::Referencesvt::TemplateContent, const
rtl::Referencesvt::TemplateContent)’:
Hi Gerald, hi all!
Am Samstag, den 06.08.2011, 19:04 +0200 schrieb Gerald Leppert:
Hi Friedrich, hi all,
does anyone here have a less rigid opinion on that matter than the one
expressed by Friedrich? I really don't care whether you want LibreOffice
to be a developers AND users community
Hi,
On Sunday, 2011-08-07 14:23:20 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
I'm trying to build with --enable-werror
Seems I'm hit by http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40146
Ok, I'll skip that file, wait for my new machine and install Debian
wheezy that has gcc 4.6.1
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG
Hi Eike,
Dnia 2011-08-07, nie o godzinie 11:17 +0200, Eike Rathke pisze:
You're right, the code is suboptimal ... in fact IsRemoved_Impl()
and
IsAdded_Impl() could also return the index of the element found so it
wouldn't be needed to be searched again. Want to take care of it?
Yes :) My
Hi Gerald, *,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Gerald Leppert glepp...@gmx.de wrote:
[...]
I only would like to know how users are allowed / should / can contribute to
the EasyHacks-system.
Sure they are, everyone is welcome to *suggest* easyhacks, but the
actual flagging as such should not be
Greetings,
I am asking here about a couple of raised assertions and a
failed database query. Maybe there is a connection, but
maybe not.
My system is ubuntu-natty (11.04), and I did a build with
configuration parameters
--disable-mozilla --enable-symbols --enable-dbgutil
changed it and pushed to master:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8b8f6835e60e179de616117f59af64d6f2c34b0a
2011/8/6 Kohei Yoshida kohei.yosh...@suse.com
Hi Markus,
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 22:01 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Hello,
this patch should ensure that we
Hi Norbert,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
The One Git conversion is done.
Just want to make sure I understand our plan correctly. The core
repository is for the master branch and future releases, while the 3.4
releases and older will still be done
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Kohei Yoshida kohei.yosh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Norbert,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
The One Git conversion is done.
Just want to make sure I understand our plan correctly. The core
repository is for the
Hi all,
I have been working on salhelper, so we could use gbuid.
There were some issues with versions of library, so I have pushed my
work to feature/gbuild branch in new core repo and Bjoern will do
there some hacking.
I hope it's just for a while.
It would be nice if you won't do changes in
Hi Maciej,
On Sunday, 2011-08-07 17:04:49 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
You're right, the code is suboptimal ... in fact IsRemoved_Impl()
and
IsAdded_Impl() could also return the index of the element found so it
wouldn't be needed to be searched again. Want to take care of it?
Yes
Dnia 2011-08-07, nie o godzinie 21:31 +0200, Eike Rathke pisze:
I suggest
::std::vectorsal_uInt32::iterator GetAdded_Impl( size_t nKey );
with logically the content of IsAdded_Impl() but using ::std::find()
instead of the awkward loop and returning the position's iterator that
can be used
Hi Gerald, Hi all,
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:51:55 +0200
Gerald Leppert glepp...@gmx.de wrote:
1. The whiteboard tag ProposedEasyHack does not seem to
have any effect. So far, I have not seen any bug tagged
as ProposedEasyHack which was touched by a developer
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Christoph, all,
On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 14:32:08 +0200
Christoph Noack christ...@dogmatux.com
wrote:
Whenever I've intended to add an Easy Hack (means: before or after
adding it to the issue tracker), I've asked a developer to have a look
at it, because: I feel confident with regard to UX
Hi Christoph, Hi all,
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 00:02:36 +0200
Christoph Noack christ...@dogmatux.com
wrote:
My question is who should review the Easy Hacks before publishing -
when looking from the Design Team perspective, it would be good to at
least add a UX (User Experience) statement whether
I've pushed
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378ca38f59518b018fccca8f
This try to automatically use ccache when present, unless CC= or CXX=
was specified by the user or --disable-ccache was passed to autogen
This also detect if CC or CXX is already an alias
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've pushed
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378ca38f59518b018fccca8f
Note on the Mac-OSX case:
The previous check was not to completely disable ccache, but only to
check whether
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've pushed
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378ca38f59518b018fccca8f
Note on the
Hi *,
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've pushed
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi *,
That's not the point is it is
if it's already an alias for ccache, it won't be prefixed with an
additional ccace
And that's not the case.
CC is checked for ccache and possibly altered, then
Hi everyone,
If you are behind a firewall like me and you previously have corkscrew
set up, you can use this URL:
git clone ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/core.git
Of course, that one requires you to have commit access.
--
Marc-André Laverdière
Software Security Scientist
28 matches
Mail list logo
