On 09/07/2011 03:14 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foleypefol...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi,
Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building
libreoffice.
0001-libcrnf.a
is that a consequence of
Hi
This is a Windows7 machine, with Visual Studio 2008 Express.
The instsetoo_native part of the seems to be failing because of some missing
dict_*.oxt files, see attached log.
Any ideas?
Thanks, Noel Grandin.
Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html
=
(1/1)
Hi,
2011/9/7 Noel Grandin n...@peralex.com:
Hi
This is a Windows7 machine, with Visual Studio 2008 Express.
The instsetoo_native part of the seems to be failing because of some missing
dict_*.oxt files, see attached log.
Any ideas?
Did you update dictionaries repo recently? These
Hi list,
I just proposed the following at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40673 :
The ways to specify
build parallelization are way to complex and confusing.
I propose the following solution:
1) We use --with-num-cpus and --with-max-jobs and --with-sense-load
2) --with-num-cpus
Hi Andras
I'm new at this, so forgive my ignorance, but as far as I know I'm building out
of only one repo:
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core
Regards, Noel.
Andras Timar wrote:
Hi,
2011/9/7 Noel Grandin n...@peralex.com:
Hi
This is a Windows7 machine, with Visual Studio 2008
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/07/2011 03:14 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foleypefol...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi,
Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building
libreoffice.
On 09/07/2011 10:28 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Stephan Bergmannsberg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/07/2011 03:14 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foleypefol...@verizon.netwrote:
Hi,
Here are some patches for various
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi list,
I just proposed the following at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40673 :
The ways to specify
build parallelization are way to complex and confusing.
I propose the following
2011/9/2 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 13:52 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Attached is the backport for 3-4 as this code changed a little between
3-4 and master.
caolanm-Andras: could you arrange to have the attached tested ?
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 04:02:36 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
really ? ok so on my Mac I build with max-job=8 num-cpu=6... what
value should I use to get the same result under the new scheme?
Counter question: Why would you want to get that result? max-job=8
num-cpu=6 gets you
2011/9/7 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 23:57 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
2011/9/5 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com:
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 00:29 +0200, Knut Olav Břhmer wrote:
Hi,
This patch solves a serious problem experienced by many companies and
need
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 04:02:36 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthiebaud-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
wrote:
really ? ok so on my Mac I build with max-job=8 num-cpu=6... what
value should I use to get the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 37195, which changed state.
Bug 37195 Summary: Dictionary access lost after LibO upgrade
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37195
What|Old Value |New Value
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:57:30AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On Sep 2, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I assume the vtable obviously has to be exported.
No, need not be exported (if none of the ctors and dtors are inline).
Ah, I had not declared the copy constructor and
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 07:21:42AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:27:38PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foley pefol...@verizon.net wrote:
Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while
building libreoffice.
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 19:49 +0200, Xisco Faulí wrote:
Hello,
I've tried to follow your steps but placing the code in
wizards/com/sun/star/wizards/fax/CallWizard.py. So far I haven't been
able to build it successfully. It complains and says: ERROR: File not
found: CallWizard.py
I see that
Hi,
In your commit 291b85778669b4e4e276faab22add9d0e80046df
(Build our mozilla (module moz) against the nss we have built anyway.)
This hunk:
--- a/moz/makefile.mk
+++ b/moz/makefile.mk
@@ -174,7 +184,7 @@ MOZ_CROSSCOMPILE=CROSS_COMPILE=1 CC=$(CC) -arch
$(MOZ_ARCH) CXX=$(CXX) -arch
Hi,
Microsoft released a new version of Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Service
Pack 1 Redistributable Package. I updated it in master:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=31cd83043eb3bf89be33a9064e04c080883bd14c
Please find attached the two patches for libreoffice-3-4.
Best
For the cppunit tests there's a wrinkle in that to be able to use
symbols which have been visibility marked up to be *private* the .o
files with those symbols need to be linked into the test shared lib.
e.g. sc's ucalc an sw'd swdoc-test cppunit tests are these
When the visibility of the symbols
Hello,
As a result of the LibreOffice Hackfest 2011 in Munich, the LibreOffice
API documentation is now online at http://api.libreoffice.org
Thanks to Andras and Miklos for their great work!
Maybe someone can add the link to our website?
Thanks,
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
On 07/09/11 09:02, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 23:57 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
2011/9/5 Caolán McNamaracaol...@redhat.com:
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 00:29 +0200, Knut Olav Břhmer wrote:
[...]
Noel was playing with the fieldfield stuff IIRC, new parsers and the
like, which
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 11:49 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi there,
Andor kindly fixed $subject (that got independently fixed on master)
- could someone please review, sign-off push to -3-4?
Looks correct to me, pushed to 3-4.
C.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 39510, which changed state.
Bug 39510 Summary: CRASH closing document with footnotes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39510
What|Old Value |New Value
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sunday, 2011-09-04 11:28:58 +0200, l...@pechlaner.at wrote:
I've made the new Functions BITAND, BITOR, BITXOR BITRSHIFT
and BITLSHIFT,, how declared in the ODF 1.2 specification. Can anyone
have a look on this Patches.
So you successfully waded your way through, good :)
As
Hi Korrawit,
On Tuesday, 2011-09-06 21:52:46 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
And please s/interger/integer ;)
Did that in the commit.
Also, it seems that you haven't check the range of ishift yet, whether
it is between -48 and 48 (from your description), or it isn't
necessary? I don't
On 09/07/2011 12:14 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:57:30AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On Sep 2, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I assume the vtable obviously has to be exported.
No, need not be exported (if none of the ctors and dtors are inline).
Hi Olivier,
On Sunday, 2011-09-04 16:42:38 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
If pushed, these new functions should be advertised in the Release notes.
What's the procedure for that?
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A
Hi,
all my pathes are under LPGLv3+ and MPL 1.1.
free software for free people.
Wolfgang
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
Noel Power wrote (07-09-11 13:19)
At the moment I kinda lack the context of the above ( and due to my
ongoing mail problems with the list I even miss the beginning of this
thread )
Had this too.
Just subscribed with a different address to get around it (i.e. receive
mails again).
Had
Could someone with access to Windows/MSVC build please update
cppuhelper/source/msvc_win32_intel.map ? You need to make the
equivalent changes as section UDK_3.8 in gcc3.map, following the
revert of the recent changes there by Kohei and the introduction of
OPropertySetHelper2.
I made some changes
On 07/09/2011 14:15, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
Noel Power wrote (07-09-11 13:19)
At the moment I kinda lack the context of the above ( and due to my
ongoing mail problems with the list I even miss the beginning of this
thread )
Had this too.
Just subscribed with a different address to get around
On 09/07/2011 12:36 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
In your commit 291b85778669b4e4e276faab22add9d0e80046df
(Build our mozilla (module moz) against the nss we have built anyway.)
[...]
Doing make only in xpcom fails from a clean state (some files that
are needed are not built), so I've
Hello!
Can I try to improve LibreOffice? I had found task «Improving Saving
Information Icon in the Status Bar»
(http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39430). But I don't know
who can help me, who can give me icons.
--
Best Regards,
Dmitry
attachment:
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:04:47 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I see a lot of sal_uInt64 in the code. Is that supported for
Windows? As far as I know at least the MSVC Express has only 4Byte
long.
Umm.. now that you mention.. sal/inc/sal/types.h has
#if (_MSC_VER = 1000)
Hi Norbert,
On Sunday, 2011-09-04 16:47:04 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I've been working on gbuildification of 'external libraires'
taking the approach of untar - patch - configure - post_patch
(sometimes it may be easier/useful to patch the result of configure,
rather that the input) -
On 09/07/2011 04:37 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:04:47 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I see a lot of sal_uInt64 in the code. Is that supported for
Windows? As far as I know at least the MSVC Express has only 4Byte
long.
Umm.. now that you mention..
Hi Markus,
On Tuesday, 2011-09-06 21:47:16 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
this patch removes some code that resulted in strange behavior with merged
areas and shadows.
That doesn't look right. ExtendMerge() includes a row/column that is
affected by the merged area's shadow and needs to be
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 14:58:50 +0200, Wolfgang Pechlaner wrote:
all my pathes are under LPGLv3+ and MPL 1.1.
free software for free people.
Great :-)
Thanks
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60
Visual Studio has supported 64-bit int types (long long) since at least Visual
Studio 2005. See here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s3f49ktz(v=vs.80).aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s3f49ktz%28v=vs.80%29.aspx
_MSC_VER evaluates to the version of the Visual Studio compiler.
Hi Eike,
Eike Rathke schrieb:
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:04:47 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I see a lot of sal_uInt64 in the code. Is that supported for
Windows? As far as I know at least the MSVC Express has only 4Byte
long.
Umm.. now that you mention.. sal/inc/sal/types.h
Hello all,
Attached patch will clear the cppcheck warning for duplicate
expression on both sides of ''.
Best Regards,
--
Korrawit Pruegsanusak
0001-cppcheck-cleaning-duplicate-expression-on-both-sides.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice
Hi guys,
Playing with the (beautiful) merging fix on master - I was struck by
the apparent reality that calc has broken style application. Load the
attached in master, double click 'Fun' in the style-list - no big/green
madness :-) Try on 3.4.x and it works as expected.
Hopefully
Hi Markus,
On Tuesday, 2011-09-06 21:47:16 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
this patch removes some code that resulted in strange behavior with merged
areas and shadows. The code extended the merged area by one column/row which
resulted in strange behavior with undo/redo. It seems that the code
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:24 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 19:49 +0200, Xisco Faulí wrote:
Hello,
I've tried to follow your steps but placing the code in
wizards/com/sun/star/wizards/fax/CallWizard.py. So far I haven't been
able to build it successfully. It
Hmm,MSC_VER 1600 is VC++ 2010
1500 is VC++ 2008
I don't have any older versions installed at the moment. (The enclosed program
I used to find these has CRLF for newlines and probably no tabs.)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From:
Um, of course, having 64 bit integers and having the bit-wise functions work on
them at full width is a bit different. Easy to test though.
The Visual C++ Express Editions have had the same 64-bit (long long) support as
the full-up Visual Studio Professional editions, etc., since the first
Hi Dennis,
Dennis E. Hamilton schrieb:
Um, of course, having 64 bit integers and having the bit-wise
functions work on them at full width is a bit different. Easy to
test though.
The Visual C++ Express Editions have had the same 64-bit (long long)
support as the full-up Visual Studio
Hi Eike
Well... no specific procedure, except to edit the wiki as I did (just to
not
forget it):
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.5#Calc
Olivier
Em 07-09-2011 09:51, Eike Rathke escreveu:
Hi Olivier,
On Sunday, 2011-09-04 16:42:38 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
If pushed,
Visual Studio has supported 64-bit int types (long long) since at least
Visual Studio 2005.
Isn't __int64 (and unsigned __int64) the more traditional name for
the 64-bit integer types in MSVC? long long is newer in MSVC; in
other compilers it is of course the normal one.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Dmitry, all!
Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2011, 18:10 +0400 schrieb Dmitry. A. Ashkadov:
Hello!
Can I try to improve LibreOffice? I had found task «Improving Saving
Information Icon in the Status Bar»
(http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39430).
Great!
But I don't know who can
On 07.09.2011 21:15, Peter Foley wrote:
This is my first attempt at converting a module to gbuild so I'd
appreciate it if someone knowlegeable about gbuild could take a look.
Thanks,
Peter
hi Peter,
looks good, didn't know we have such a simple module :)
only thing missing is that
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Peter Foley wrote:
All of my patches are contributed under
MPL 1.1/GLPv3+/LGPLv3+
Thanks,
Peter
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Michael Stahl m...@openoffice.org wrote:
On 07.09.2011 21:15, Peter Foley wrote:
This is my first attempt at converting a module to gbuild so I'd
appreciate it if someone knowlegeable about gbuild could take a look.
Thanks,
Peter
hi Peter,
looks good,
ok, fits in better with the other RepositoryFoo.mk stuff.
but why not just RepositoryModule.mk?
Some hope/anticipation that there may be more than one product sharing
the same spaces ? not sure...
I have never fully understood why we have these Repository*.mk files
in the top directory at
Hi Olivier,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 15:59:29 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
Well... no specific procedure, except to edit the wiki as I did
(just to not
forget it):
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.5#Calc
Thanks, just needed a pointer..
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG
Hi,
Michael Meeks wrote (07-09-11 17:37)
Playing with the (beautiful) merging fix on master - I was struck by
the apparent reality that calc has broken style application. Load the
attached in master, double click 'Fun' in the style-list - no big/green
madness :-) Try on 3.4.x and it
On Wednesday 07 September 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Troy, will you come up with a fix that brings
sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx and
sw/qa/complex/writer/CheckCrossReferences.java in sync again?
I won't be able to do that until mid November due to other commitments.
--
Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 16:58:04 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
so what evaluates _MSC_VER to in MSVCE?
How can I get that information?
In Env.Host.sh I get the lines:
SIZEOF_LONGLONG=8
I think if long long is supported to be 8 bytes we can safely assume
that the typedef of
On 07.09.2011 22:40, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
ok, fits in better with the other RepositoryFoo.mk stuff.
but why not just RepositoryModule.mk?
Some hope/anticipation that there may be more than one product sharing
the same spaces ? not sure...
I have never fully understood why we have these
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wonder would that work dep wise to just have a packaging step ?
$(call gb_Library_get_headers_target,libthatneedsmesa) : \
$(call gb_Package_get_target,Mesa_inc)
Of course, we could create a new name for that, but
Hello,
After having listened the advice of Caolán and Thorsten, here is a new patch
for svgwriter.cxx (filter module).
I hope having followed the guidelines and haven't missed anything this time.
Julien.
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3318017/newpatchsvgwriter.txt
On 07.09.2011 22:32, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Michael Stahl m...@openoffice.org wrote:
On 07.09.2011 21:15, Peter Foley wrote:
This is my first attempt at converting a module to gbuild so I'd
appreciate it if someone knowlegeable about gbuild could take a look.
Hi,
We discussed with Andras that one of the bottleneck of a build with many
languages is the slowness of the po2oo script from translations-toolkit.
I gave it a try to rewrite it as a standalone script, and it seems to be
quite fast here:
$ time po2oo --skipsource -i hu/ -o hu.sdf -l hu -t
argh... bjorn use of gmane screw-up my reply-all thing...
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud
Hi Michael,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 16:37:44 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Playing with the (beautiful) merging fix on master - I was struck by
the apparent reality that calc has broken style application.
Classical copypaste error ;-)
Hi Korrawit,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 22:01:09 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Attached patch will clear the cppcheck warning for duplicate
expression on both sides of ''.
Yup, good catch!
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a58ed493e572fef2c503bd329e924bb062ba9c96
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wonder would that work dep wise to just have a packaging step ?
$(call gb_Library_get_headers_target,libthatneedsmesa) : \
$(call gb_Package_get_target,Mesa_inc)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Peter Foley pefol...@verizon.net wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wonder would that work dep wise to just have a packaging step ?
$(call
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose that to be perfect that should bu tuck under
gb_LinkTarget_use_Mesa in RepositoryExternal.mk to properly deal with
the case when using system-mesa vs internal-mesa...
and then just add Mesa to the list of
Recently my MacOSX tinderbox started to die for weir reason... (too
many open pipe, etc)
as it turned out there was massive leakage fo file in the temp
directory with each build.. 150 or so per build... after a while
mktemp was running out of filename and working very-very hard to find
an empty
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 16:55 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi there,
I'd like to have
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8bf60230255e0e8da66cafff578f148858cee4ca
cherry-picked to the 3.4 branch. A patch for this commit is attached as
well for convenience.
...
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Peter Foley pefol...@verizon.net wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wonder would that work dep wise to just
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 06:05:18PMr +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
LibreOffice uses ODBC escapes for literals, e.g. for dates: {D
2011-08-28} In particular, it does that when one asks for a filter
on a date column in a form or table.
Now, for example PostgreSQL does not support that
The original message was received at Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:33:16 +0530
from lists.freedesktop.org [167.62.236.17]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to server
Review sign-off appreciated.
Done.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
¡ÃQAÊ»J{ª¹¯ßÉÂÓÀëy2ÉA¨áB¾0bã:g±zU`K!¢?p¨fÒOß)4ì{îð`Ü´Ei¶a´#¼H[äÌm»Ù)²©ÂáÝDláÅô¯ ¡ô/S÷j
4ec:'9¼ÍBGÒ«$x¡k$ÓhIR©³*¯0}PÂVªm¿Lí5À
jRçISE¢.Pf§À}]ÅâuP1`ĦJ8cc6Å YOIÃ1ºtmlÚã65Û-ÞÚ:ÂSýôWiA¥cêP×eÂ~Õu7f¨Ùöï÷:n|½[^³Ð7oã
ä. [Ç«:l¸qNF4
Hi All,
As some people may have noticed, I have done a little bit of work in
LibO recently, and submitted a few patches.
Just a quick question. Is there currently a maintainer of the LibO website?
I ask because while I do C/C++ programming as a hobby, my occupation
involves wbesite programming
78 matches
Mail list logo
