bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/cpp2uno.cxx |6 ++
bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/uno2cpp.cxx |3 ++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit e13dc26e394ede799a60691638971cf1d9689f74
Author: Jani Monoses j...@ubuntu.com
Date: Tue Feb 21 01
insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit dab11f7fe2a2fa4155e4c4feaa5fc54e57cfbd37
Author: Jani Monoses j...@ubuntu.com
Date: Fri Feb 10 14:50:22 2012 +0200
ARM bridge: VFP ABI (armhf) support
diff --git a/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/armhelper.S
b/bridges/source/cpp_uno
bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/uno2cpp.cxx |7 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 4e679ee2501a0babcdce498732d68428d46481e3
Author: Jani Monoses j...@ubuntu.com
Date: Fri Feb 3 22:11:08 2012 +0200
Simplify code and use proper register
bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/uno2cpp.cxx | 49 --
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit a55fa2d0a8f709bd58e2729b66fd8ecc807c0286
Author: Jani Monoses j...@ubuntu.com
Date: Wed Feb 8 21:23:50 2012 +0200
Remove unnecessary
configure.in |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit b3aabdb9a12b550c0c3a537adf4517d5676dec69
Author: Jani Monoses j...@ubuntu.com
Date: Fri Feb 3 11:58:25 2012 +0200
Fix typo in configure message
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index 6009518
configure.in |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 40991706e4343789015432331d5be93fd7abe373
Author: Jani Monoses j...@ubuntu.com
Date: Fri Feb 3 12:09:02 2012 +0200
Fix configure step on various arm linux targets.
Use arm* wildcard
On 09/29/2011 06:01 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Hi,
I was noticed that there is package called npapi-sdk [1] that can be
used as firefox/mozilla headers instead of requiring whole beast to
build the plugins.
Do you think it would be possible to use this in libreoffice, or is it
impossible?
I
On 04/21/2011 07:17 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi all,
I just want to bring up an idea of which I am not really sure if it is
a good one. Currently we have new contributors writing patches to the
dev-ML and grant them direct repository access later. Commiting
directly on the master might be
On 01/29/2011 03:04 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
What about using GCC atomic builtins like in the attached patch?
Excellent, the pthread fallback always niggled me.
Sorry for not thinking about this earlier, can this be cherry-picked
On 03/09/2011 06:01 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:46 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
On 01/29/2011 03:04 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
What about using GCC atomic builtins like in the attached patch?
Excellent, the pthread
From 7305b53aad89f4c0362e6126edc8f1930eed22f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jani Monoses jani.mono...@canonical.com
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:33:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused declaration
---
sc/source/core/tool/token.cxx |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
Hi Michael,
thanks for pushing to 3.3
When there's a relase with the patch included, it should close this
issue I opened a few days ago
https://bugs.freedesktop.org//show_bug.cgi?id=33402
Having said that, it is already fixed in master, so I just merged your
patch to libreoffice-3-3
On 01/27/2011 05:31 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:42 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
armel
sal/osl/unx/interlck.c probably should have a specific impl for arm btw,
probably a low hanging fruit for someone who knows a little bit of arm
assembly.
What about using GCC atomic
On 01/25/2011 11:13 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 25/01/11 08:24, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit :
Hi Jonathan,
Correct me if I am wrong but wont LO be a little screwed since LO only
supports X from what I have seen codewise?
That was precisely my point : applications have to be rewritten
On 11/27/2010 05:36 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:22:06PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:08:37PM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
hey guys what is being done to get LO into debian so that downstream
It already for almost a month.
to
The OPs mail simply shows Ubuntus attitude and cluelessless, both reasons for
why they have to die.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g#t=1m20s
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On 11/03/2010 04:06 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:30 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 12:47 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Quite; cf. such uncertainty - it probably makes considerable sense to
look into a migration strategy from Java to (insert
Is there a list of which compilers are supported and what versions
recommeneded for building LO?
I was thinking of the feasibility of using gcc's __builtin_constant_p in
a macro to differentiate fast and not so fast paths for createFromAscii
cases to keep the code uniform but still get the
Hello,
This changes the only occurrence in writer/starmath.
The wiki entry does not mention it, but should
UNOOUSTRING::createFromAscii (not OUString) be replaced as well?
There are two of that in starmath
Jani
From da30daf2c9cf9d1f19da7b674a8896fc5fa6e453 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jani
This page describes building in the topmost dir
http://www.documentfoundation.org/develop/
whereas the wiki-page example changes to rawbuild before.
Which one is recommended? I have been building from topmost dir so far.
thanks
Jani
___
LibreOffice
20 matches
Mail list logo