/style/styleexp.cxx| 50 ++
6 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 6a53a750e48c8a7b6ea6bf263eae80179374016e
Author: Troy Rollo <libreoff...@troy.rollo.name>
Date: Tue Jun 6 17:41:33 2017 +1000
tdf#103091 conditional style conditions not
/style/styleexp.cxx| 50 ++
6 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 5649def882dfd00bd9e7f8d9d079955daf80bebb
Author: Troy Rollo <libreoff...@troy.rollo.name>
Date: Tue Jun 6 17:41:33 2017 +1000
tdf#103091 conditional style conditions not
/style/styleexp.cxx| 50 ++
6 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit e9869b9b38d4e4e7f893aecb26f73d985f17e350
Author: Troy Rollo <libreoff...@troy.rollo.name>
Date: Tue Jun 6 17:41:33 2017 +1000
tdf#103091 conditional style conditions not
/style/styleexp.cxx| 50 ++
6 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit a5b4cb3f836c991d0647f55e1ef4920ce6115eac
Author: Troy Rollo <libreoff...@troy.rollo.name>
Date: Tue Jun 6 17:41:33 2017 +1000
tdf#103091 conditional style conditions not
4760c79afe37eaa95a93f3e8ad0a2775c86359dd
Author: Troy Rollo libreoff...@troy.rollo.name
Date: Mon Aug 26 15:14:40 2013 +0200
fdo#33960: sw: fix cross reference fields some more
Change-Id: I46f9cf4132835c10ad82c9b014e5e8647902ab5e
Signed-off-by: Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com
diff
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Miklos Vajna wrote:
Hi Troy,
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 01:06:21PM +1000, Troy Rollo t...@troy.rollo.name
wrote:
Bug 36960 was never fixed correctly (or rather, I suspect it was fixed,
then broken when work was done to make the tests pass).
What but is this? https
Bug 36960 was never fixed correctly (or rather, I suspect it was fixed, then
broken when work was done to make the tests pass). The attached patch fixes
the bug and adds new tests for cross-references to numbered paragraphs. The
nature of the bug is that if you have numbered paragraphs like
All of my past future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the
MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license
On Friday 11 May 2012, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Troy,
I'm just working through the MPL/LGPLv3+ re-licensing audit at
the moment (so we can include code from Apache OpenOffice :-) What
On Wednesday 07 September 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Troy, will you come up with a fix that brings
sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx and
sw/qa/complex/writer/CheckCrossReferences.java in sync again?
I won't be able to do that until mid November due to other commitments.
--
On Wednesday 07 September 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
final String FldResult1 = *i*;
final String FldResult2 = +b+*i*;
final String FldResult3 = -1-+b+*i*;
-final String FldResult4 = 1.;
-final String FldResult5 =
This patch appears to be fix fdo#36868. The problem is that the paragraph
style was never being assigned an outline list level. The saved file did
not have an sprmPOutLvl for that paragraph (although it did have one for
the level 0 style), just an sprmPIlvl and an sprmPIlfo. Therefore there
was no
This replaces the earlier version of this patch, which was wrong for the
NUMBER_FULL_CONTEXT cross-reference type.
---
writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper_Impl.cxx | 20 +++-
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Prior to this patch, fields were being exported to docx file with the
field value being the name of the field. This patch changes it to
export the field value as the field value.
---
sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.cxx |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
Before this patch, when importing from docx, if there were no parent
numbering levels in the number formats for outline numbered paragraphs, the
import would include all parent levels back to the second numbering level,
in the third and subsequent numbering levels.
---
The first part of this patch adds importing of cross-references to numbered
paragraphs from docx file.
The second part provides a fix to imports of bookmarks from docx, which in
the test files I have end up importing with an empty bookmark name. The
problem is that for each bookmark,
On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Ahhh, gotcha. Indeed, nice catch. Looks good to me, and gives the
expected results. Pushed. Can you confirm the patch is under our
preferred LGPLv3+/MPLv1.1 combo ?
Sure, although I doubt there would be any copyright in that particular patch.
On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Well, this'll work I guess, and I'm minded to push it, but why ;-) Is
there a concrete bug this fixes ?
Yes, but it is a little obscure. If you take the attached ODT file, save it as
an RTF, and then load the RTF, the prefix to the paragraph
On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Hello Troy,
Digging mailing-list archive and just glancing at your patch,
isn't this patch against fdo#33960 ?
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33960)
IMHO it isn't likely to be 33898.
It should have said 33893 (although I
---
svtools/source/svrtf/parrtf.cxx | 22 +-
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/svtools/source/svrtf/parrtf.cxx b/svtools/source/svrtf/parrtf.cxx
index 0b722d8..0c60834 100644
--- a/svtools/source/svrtf/parrtf.cxx
+++
---
sw/source/filter/rtf/rtffld.cxx | 50 -
sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8atr.cxx | 12 +++
sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8par5.cxx | 63 +++--
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Tuesday 12 July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
This looks good, however what does it do :-) Set sane leading/trailing
text/space defaults for a new list numbering level based on the previous
one ?
Implements the rules discussed in
---
sw/inc/numrule.hxx| 10 ++-
sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx | 56 ++---
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sw/inc/numrule.hxx b/sw/inc/numrule.hxx
index 26d0eff..392ac06 100644
--- a/sw/inc/numrule.hxx
+++
---
sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx b/sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx
index 95ea5c8..d7df858 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx
@@ -770,7 +770,15
23 matches
Mail list logo
