- Original Message
From: Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org
To: michael.me...@novell.com
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote:
Just remember, that even with LGPL/GPL the changes _do not have to be
contributed back to the community_; only made available to the customers of
that
product upon request (per LGPL, GPL and MPL).
Not entirely correct. The source has to be
- Original Message
From: Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com
To: BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote:
Just remember
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:32 -0700, BRM wrote:
- Original Message
From: Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com
To: BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing
On Mon, 2011
If I understand correctly:
What is developed by the Apache license can be used at LibreOffice but
what is done by LibreOffice
can not be used by OpenOffice as OpenOffice would move to offer the
principles of under the GPL.
I'm not sure this is entirely correct. TDF allowed itself some license
Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
make any derivative work, you need to make those changes available to the
rest,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:59, Rafael Dominguez venccsra...@gmail.com wrote:
Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we say MPLv2 and LGPLv3+ - that is fine; and the
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice)
Le 2011-06-04 12:11, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we
10 matches
Mail list logo
