HI all
Please note my email change from oooc...@free.fr to
lgodard.li...@laposte.net
the most important
I license all my contributions past+future under
MPL/LGPLv3+
Laurent
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
I confirm that all my patches to LibreOffice are licensed under
LGPL3+/GPL3+/MPL.
Ivan Timofeev.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
hi all,
licensing statement, valid until further notice:
Any patches of which i'm the author that i send to the LibreOffice lists
or commit to the LibreOffice repos are available under LGPLv3+/MPLv1.1
license unless explicitly noted otherwise, or, in case of newly added
files, the license
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Peter Foley pefol...@verizon.net wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Peter Foley wrote:
All of my patches are contributed under
MPL 1.1/GLPv3+/LGPLv3+
Thanks,
Thanks you for that, and thank you for having updated
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Peter Foley wrote:
All of my patches are contributed under
MPL 1.1/GLPv3+/LGPLv3+
Thanks,
Peter
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Norbert,
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 15:01 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I've added a 'License' column in the list of developers in the wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers
Thanks for doing that :-) there is a 'le...@documentfoundation.org'
alias - to which I
I've added a 'License' column in the list of developers in the wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers
This column is meant to have links to post(s) in the mailing list that
indicate the concerned developers statement of license.
This is useful for patch reviewer/committer
Hello there,
Yeah, I'd like add to what Thorsten said. My work(Including GSOC works
and apart from that) can be submitted to LGPLv3+/MPL dual license and
its future versions also.
Regards
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Anurag Jain wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'd like to say that all my contribution towards Libre office suite
codebase can be licensed under LGPSv3/MPL dual license. My work will
includes all the patches which I've submitted under GSOC program and
apart from that , and LGPLv3/MPL can be applied to all of them.
Thanks
- Original Message
From: Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org
To: michael.me...@novell.com
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote:
Just remember, that even with LGPL/GPL the changes _do not have to be
contributed back to the community_; only made available to the customers of
that
product upon request (per LGPL, GPL and MPL).
Not entirely correct. The source has to be
- Original Message
From: Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com
To: BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:39 -0700, BRM wrote:
Just remember
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:32 -0700, BRM wrote:
- Original Message
From: Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com
To: BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 11:44:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice licensing
On Mon, 2011
If I understand correctly:
What is developed by the Apache license can be used at LibreOffice but
what is done by LibreOffice
can not be used by OpenOffice as OpenOffice would move to offer the
principles of under the GPL.
I'm not sure this is entirely correct. TDF allowed itself some license
Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
make any derivative work, you need to make those changes available to the
rest,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:59, Rafael Dominguez venccsra...@gmail.com wrote:
Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we say MPLv2 and LGPLv3+ - that is fine; and the
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice)
Le 2011-06-04 12:11, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
1. TDF takes OOo under the Apache License and combines it with LO
contributions under the LGPL/MPL and licenses the combined work
(LibreOffice) under both the LGPL and MPL?
So if we
20 matches
Mail list logo
