https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161003
--- Comment #1 from ardv ---
this problem also occurs with: table borders and frame borders.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161040
Jérôme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102062, 103239
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161040
Jérôme changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161040
Jérôme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103184
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161040
Bug ID: 161040
Summary: application colors scheme : offer a drop-down list in
toolbars
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.4.7.2 release
Hardware: All
||ice.org
Severity|normal |enhancement
Summary|poetry install |Footnote separator should
||offer automatic color
| ✔ desktop
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #13 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #10)
> Can 'relevant online sources' be made specific enough to be workable and
> maintainable?
Extending my reply from the design meeting: I believe the most
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102985
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102985
Referenced Bugs:
, resolving this bug doesn't obviate 96872, as this bug
will only see action when a font in an opened document is missing, but will not
offer additional fonts to users creating new documents.
* ... so the bugs can't be dupes of each other.
With that said - I believe that configuring online font
, resolving this bug doesn't obviate 96872, as this bug
will only see action when a font in an opened document is missing, but will not
offer additional fonts to users creating new documents.
* ... so the bugs can't be dupes of each other.
With that said - I believe that configuring online font
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #10
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #10
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Offer to download & install |Offer to download mis
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Offer to download & install |Offer to download mis
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote ---
Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license. Nor can we
police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used.
But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote ---
Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license. Nor can we
police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used.
But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
Sounds to me like asking for a swiss-army-knife. Font management tools should
give hints on meta data.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
Sounds to me like asking for a swiss-army-knife. Font management tools should
give hints on meta data.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote ---
I don't think a context menu on a listbox entry selection would be a reasonable
way to do this. Too many listboxes across the UI would be affected to start
including a context menu for the class.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote ---
I don't think a context menu on a listbox entry selection would be a reasonable
way to do this. Too many listboxes across the UI would be affected to start
including a context menu for the class.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> It may not affect the UI but I still don't buy the rationale and think it's
> nerdy feature creep. Do you have a real life example like "Every time I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> It may not affect the UI but I still don't buy the rationale and think it's
> nerdy feature creep. Do you have a real life example like "Every time I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
It may not affect the UI but I still don't buy the rationale and think it's
nerdy feature creep. Do you have a real life example like "Every time I have to
pick one out of my hundert different fonts I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152487
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
It may not affect the UI but I still don't buy the rationale and think it's
nerdy feature creep. Do you have a real life example like "Every time I have to
pick one out of my hundert different fonts I
||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
||.freedesktop.org
Keywords||needsUXEval
Summary|When right-linking a font |When right-clicking a font
|family combo-box, offer |family
||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
||.freedesktop.org
Keywords||needsUXEval
Summary|When right-linking a font |When right-clicking a font
|family combo-box, offer |family
not responding after
|Windows' "Offer suggested |copying cells with Windows'
|actions" set ON |"Offer suggested actions"
||set ON
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> > Was it really? IIANM, this font substitution is not defined by default.
>
and here in lo_documentLoadWithOptions()
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> > Was it really? IIANM, this font substitution is not defined by default.
>
and here in lo_documentLoadWithOptions()
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
>
> > The LO deployed crosextra Carlito <--> Calibri mapping has been functional
> > until now for interoperability with MS Office, but that is no
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
>
> > The LO deployed crosextra Carlito <--> Calibri mapping has been functional
> > until now for interoperability with MS Office, but that is no
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #5 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
>
> What about this? :
>
> https://www.techspot.com/downloads/downloadnow/7566/
> ?evp=05d5172f044d732dc42277fe5969fca6=10967
>
It is an incomplete
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #5 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
>
> What about this? :
>
> https://www.techspot.com/downloads/downloadnow/7566/
> ?evp=05d5172f044d732dc42277fe5969fca6=10967
>
It is an incomplete
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> I'm against installing fonts, in particular to some extra folder (see bug
> 103140), We should aim for "Smaller default font name list" (bug 91130) and
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> I'm against installing fonts, in particular to some extra folder (see bug
> 103140), We should aim for "Smaller default font name list" (bug 91130) and
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1)
> Currently no viable "online source" for Aptos (it is cloud only licensing)
> nor for a metrically equivalent font.
What about this? :
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1)
> Currently no viable "online source" for Aptos (it is cloud only licensing)
> nor for a metrically equivalent font.
What about this? :
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
I'm against installing fonts, in particular to some extra folder (see bug
103140), We should aim for "Smaller default font name list" (bug 91130) and
"make font installation optional in Windows GUI"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
I'm against installing fonts, in particular to some extra folder (see bug
103140), We should aim for "Smaller default font name list" (bug 91130) and
"make font installation optional in Windows GUI"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote ---
MS Aptos will come to a head very quickly as more MS 365 and Office 2021 users
normal.dot are moved onto that replacement Cloud font (requiring a MS login).
Currently no viable "online source" for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote ---
MS Aptos will come to a head very quickly as more MS 365 and Office 2021 users
normal.dot are moved onto that replacement Cloud font (requiring a MS login).
Currently no viable "online source" for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Offer to download missing |Offer to download & ins
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
Bug ID: 159950
Summary: Offer to download missing fonts from online sources
Product: LibreOffice
Version: Inherited From OOo
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114052
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102985
Referenced Bugs:
|should always be the|style should always be the
|topmost offer even if only |topmost offer even if only
|applied character styles is |applied character styles is
|selected|selected
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159724
Bug ID: 159724
Summary: No special character style should always be the
topmost offer even if only applied character styles is
selected
Product: LibreOffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159402
--- Comment #6 from Jean-Pierre Ledure ---
(In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #4)
> Maybe we could consider reviving this library, fixing its issues and adding
> new macros with lots of comments for new LO macro programmers.
After a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159402
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alain.romedenne@libreoffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159402
Rafael Lima changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159402
--- Comment #4 from Rafael Lima ---
I understand there is a steep learning curve for writing LibreOffice scripts
(either Basic or Python), and we should consider strategies to make it easier
to learn the basics of macro programming in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159402
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Gimmicks > AutoText...
Learning the JARL autotext, quite cynical to have this as four character
solution - installed by default.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159402
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
We have plenty of examples, see Tools > Macros > Edit Macros: Application
Macros & Dialogs, eg. Gimmicks > AutoText... run per F5.
I don't think that we should make it easier to run/edit since using
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159402
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159402
carrt7 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||difficultyBeginner,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159402
Bug ID: 159402
Summary: Writer should offer a working macro immediately
user-available, to encourage new macro users
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.6.4.1 release
||ice.org
--- Comment #3 from Buovjaga ---
Apparently "Offer suggested actions" is only available on activated Windows
installs, so I can't test it in my virtual machine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--- Comment #2 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #1)
> Thanks for the report. This is possibly related to bug 153131, I asked there.
Reading [1], "Offer suggested actions" seems to be a new Windows 11 feature.
Since I don't have Windows 11 here,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158691
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158691
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158691
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment
--
You
with
|Calc goes into Not |Windows' "Offer suggested
|Responding, locks up and|actions" set ON
|freezes.|
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114052
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137143
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103341
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156363
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156363
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156363
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156363
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156363
--- Comment #1 from Rafael Lima ---
Created attachment 188455
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=188455=edit
PPTX file used in the screenshots
This is the PPTX file shown in the screenshot. Open it in Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156363
Bug ID: 156363
Summary: Impress needs to offer image presets to allow quick
image formatting
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.5.4.2 release
Hardware: All
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156252
--- Comment #3 from LeroyG ---
(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #2)
There must have been something wrong with my test. Now I can confirm that
there's no need to create a new style.
Thanks m.a.riosv.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156252
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156252
--- Comment #1 from LeroyG ---
I think that this is an enhancement request, provided that I can create a
Portrait page style, and choose it from the Page Style list in the Insert Break
dialog.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
|format 'portrait' only |offer format 'portrait' if
|offers 'landscape' if |document is was started
|document is begun in|using orientation
|landscape |'landscape'
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153137
--- Comment #6 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to ady from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #2)
> > recovery should simply not try to recover files that were open in
> > read-only mode. Because it means there was no
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153137
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154896
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154896
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155025
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154896
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
Wouldn't call the edit field workflow a workaround. And if you combine two
documents the field numbers will be updated anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154896
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
Wouldn't call the edit field workflow a workaround. And if you combine two
documents the field numbers will be updated anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154896
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de,
|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154896
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de,
|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155025
Bug ID: 155025
Summary: Consider LocalAppData folder on Windows as
"temporary", and do not offer saving into it
Product: LibreOffice
Version: unspecified
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153988
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153988
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154896
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||114426
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154896
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154896
Bug ID: 154896
Summary: Insert caption dialog doesn't offer controlling the
first number
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.6.0.0 alpha0+ Master
Hardware: All
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151688
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102847
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153988
--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> As commented on the duplicate bug 153987 comment 2 it works out of the box,
> which is unclear why.
Heiko, I can't make sense of your statement, as this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153988
--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> As commented on the duplicate bug 153987 comment 2 it works out of the box,
> which is unclear why.
Heiko, I can't make sense of your statement, as this
1 - 100 of 386 matches
Mail list logo
