https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bugs should be fixed and|RegEx based search should
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
f...@bger.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
--- Comment #7 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #6)
I don't see how this "works". The problem is that it can't match anything
across paragraphs' bounds, like "two last characters of paragraph and three
firs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote ---
OK, we don't/can't test "paragraph" breaks with regexp because there are none
(that ICU can parses) and IIRC we would have to refactor to support the regexp
look-behind/look-ahead modes.
Otherwise
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
f...@bger.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from f...
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:25.2.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
--- Comment #11 from Commit Notification
---
Pierre F committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/help/commit/e3caa53e99709b7099611b67cf73e9bdbd8801ea
more (simple) regex example
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
--- Comment #12 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #11)
> Pierre F committed a patch related to this issue.
> It has been pushed to "master":
>
> https://git.libreoffice.org/help/commit/
> e3caa53e99709
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
--- Comment #13 from f...@bger.ch ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #12)
thanks Stuart for the feedback,
> ... not sure we
> yet have quite the correct wording about Regexp matches and Paragraphs.
>
> "A search using a regul
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
--- Comment #14 from f...@bger.ch ---
Created attachment 195994
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=195994&action=edit
regex can't cross OVER the paragraph boundary
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
--- Comment #15 from f...@bger.ch ---
Created attachment 195995
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=195995&action=edit
match strings at the Paragraph bounds, e.g. xyz$ or ^abc
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
--- Comment #16 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to fpy from comment #13)
>
> yes. what I'm trying to say, is a regex can't cross OVER the paragraph
> boundary (see attachment)
> feel free to suggest a better wording of course.
>
Yes,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159607
--- Comment #17 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #16)
> > yes. what I'm trying to say, is a regex can't cross OVER the paragraph
> > boundary (see attachment)
> > feel free to suggest a better wording of co
16 matches
Mail list logo
