https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED
--- Comment #70 from tommy27
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Shantanu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #69 from Xisco Faulí ---
*** Bug 133700 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|MOVED |FIXED
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |MOVED
--- Comment #67 from tommy27
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #66 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #65)
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #63)
> > Reopening... but might be better to move to a new issue?
>
> New issue is better, if anyone cares to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #64 from Julien Nabet ---
Created attachment 154391
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=154391=edit
perf flamegraph
Here's an update with master sources updated today
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #154269|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #62 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #61)
> ...
>
> I will try another approach:
>
> a) do things incorrectly, making problems appear everywhere, but having the
> performance be fantastic
> b) do
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #61 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to tommy27 from comment #60)
> sorry but I've never fully understood what Caolan meant (that's because I
> have no proper code knowledge).
>
> even if that was not a "traditional regression"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #60 from tommy27 ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #58)
> (In reply to tommy27 from comment #55)
> > however the performance is still worse than 5.3.7 where it was quite fast.
> >
> > as mentioned several time, the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #59 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-6-3":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/4ea561aa56208c63938fbc4dbf1e1e509de456ec
tdf#109158
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #58 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to tommy27 from comment #55)
> however the performance is still worse than 5.3.7 where it was quite fast.
>
> as mentioned several time, the regression happened in 6.0.x development
> (comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #57 from Xisco Faulí ---
(In reply to tommy27 from comment #55)
> do you think a new clean report should be opened or should we continue over
> this one.
+1 from me. this one already has more than 50 comments...
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #56 from Julien Nabet ---
I'll retrieve another Flamegraph with master sources updated today so I got all
the Noel's patches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #55 from tommy27 ---
(In reply to tommy27 from comment #45)
> performance declined from 6.1.x to 6.2.x
>
> a huge autocorrect table that loads in 14 seconds under LibO 6.1.3
> now takes 32 seconds to load in LibO 6.2.7
>
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:6.3.0 target:6.4.0 |target:6.3.0 target:6.4.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #54 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-6-3":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/36ea8194ae86a9072b2d8a1154ac5e8c83764fce
tdf#109158
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #53 from Xisco Faulí ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #52)
> @tommy27, @V Stuart Foote, Could you please check again this issue with a
> master build containing noel's commits ?
Any update?
Meanwhile, I'm going to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #52 from Xisco Faulí ---
@tommy27, @V Stuart Foote, Could you please check again this issue with a
master build containing noel's commits ?
in
Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: ea4f3099d6e0cf30d80caa8b2121c7a358f80fdd
CPU
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Noel Grandin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #51 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/ea4f3099d6e0cf30d80caa8b2121c7a358f80fdd
tdf#109158 improve
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #50 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/77dec7588c9141b03f8ec0139eb96c298b26f261
tdf#109158 improve
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||noelgran...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #48 from Julien Nabet ---
Created attachment 154269
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=154269=edit
perf flamegraph
Here's a Flamegraph retrieved on pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated
today
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #47 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #46)
> @Julien Nabet, any chance you could get a perf chart here ?
No pb, I'll do this after my day time job.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #45 from tommy27 ---
performance declined from 6.1.x to 6.2.x
a huge autocorrect table that loads in 14 seconds under LibO 6.1.3
now takes 32 seconds to load in LibO 6.2.7
awful performance drop...
I'm stuck with 6.1.x
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #44 from tommy27 ---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #42 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-6-3":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/3a2d31cdd684b42b0921917dc7a8c27d6f6bb25a%5E%21
tdf#109158
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:6.3.0 target:6.4.0 |target:6.3.0 target:6.4.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Noel Grandin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #41 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/ab7652aabf9c1c91980d47c9d1be30b24313f142%5E%21
tdf#109158 slow
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:6.3.0|target:6.3.0 target:6.4.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #40 from tommy27 ---
the issue doesn't affect the 5.4.x branch and appeared during the developement
of the 6.0.x branch (see comment 11).
a bibisect was performed long time ago (see comment 13) but it seems that
information
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #39 from V Stuart Foote ---
Hmm, issue remains (compare a 5.3.7/5.4.0 load of attachment 134684 to current
master) a large (in both count & width) correction table that was quickly
loaded at one point is has become painfully
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #38 from Commit Notification
---
Caolán McNamara committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/86618248683fa4048192d15356c7e6b430e8dbb9%5E%21
tdf#109158
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:6.3.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #37 from Commit Notification
---
Caolán McNamara committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/50588a1583e3cc5dc647a35889e50478c7bfd033%5E%21
Related:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|highest |medium
--- Comment #36 from Telesto
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |highest
--- Comment #35 from tommy27
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #34 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #33)
> testing size of the list, assigning a fixed width when list is > some number
And of course not a fixed width (which would be ugly). But rather than
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.me...@collabora.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #32 from tommy27 ---
retested under Win8.1 x64
there's a worsening of the bug...
6.0.5.2 still takes 23 seconds to load
6.1.0.3 takes 27 seconds to load.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #31 from Xisco Faulí ---
Created attachment 143558
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=143558=edit
Callgrind trace from bug 118761. Thanks to Buovjaga
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||todven...@suomi24.fi
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #29 from tommy27 ---
interestingly LibO 6.0.4 x64 takes the same amount of time to load that list of
the corresponding x32 version.
I hoped that x64 could be faster but I wasn't right
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #28 from V Stuart Foote ---
Of course it remains slow--populating an autocorrect listbox of 200K
entries--each pair of strings has their size precisely calculated with
GetTextWidth() and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #27 from tommy27 ---
issue confirmed even on a Windows 10 Pro for Workstations 64-bit
CPU Intel Xeon @ 3.60GHz
RAM 16GB
Motherboard HP 81C5 (CPU0)
autocorrect table loads in 3 seconds using 5.3.7
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #26 from tommy27 ---
bad performance affects LibO 6.2.x master too.
it still takes 23 seconds to load the list under Win8 x64 on a SSD disk.
the same list is loaded in 8 seconds with LibO 5.3.7
this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #25 from tommy27 ---
I hope this issue could be addressed by some developer.
the bibisect data is already available (see comment 13) and there are also some
hints about a possible solution (see comment 23)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #24 from tommy27 ---
thanks Stuart for confirming the regression and giving some insight about the
bug roots
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #22 from tommy27 ---
a portable 5.3.7 release is available here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/winpenpack/files/X-LibreOffice/releases/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #21 from tommy27 ---
@Stuart
yes, parsing 200K entries must cause some load, but why LibO 6.x and 5.4.x load
the same autocorrect replacament table 3 times slower than 5.3.x ?
the point of my report is that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #19 from tommy27 ---
bug still present in 6.1.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: e0a94ded5d1635fa2a2d9e222bfcfa0a2289a01f
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.4.0.3 release |5.4.1.2 release
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nthieb...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #16 from tommy27 ---
retested on latest daily build (*) but this time the performance is worsened a
lot...
it takes 23 seconds instead of 12 of october 31st build.
(*) 6.0.0.0.alpha1+
Build ID:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #15 from tommy27 ---
retested on the same Win8.1 x64 machine as in comment 4
> LibO 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ (the day before bug 99071 fix)
> TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-07-13_23:50:53
> takes 8
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #14 from tommy27 ---
(In reply to Caolán McNamara from comment #12)
> which is, quite frankly, useless information in the sense that if one picks
> a fairly random fixed value as the size of text instead of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #13 from Telesto ---
Created attachment 136759
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=136759=edit
Bibisect log
~/bibisect-win32-6.0
$ git bisect good
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #12 from Caolán McNamara ---
which is, quite frankly, useless information in the sense that if one picks a
fairly random fixed value as the size of text instead of measuring it then its
faster to use that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #11 from tommy27 ---
performance drop unchanged with latest LibO 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ daily build
downloaded tonight.
I confirm the perfomance regression (test done on a Win8.1 x64 machine, but
affects Win7 x74 as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103341
Referenced
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bibisectRequest
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #9 from tommy27 ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #8)
> I can confirm a slow down:
> Version: 5.4.0.3 -> 4 seconds
> Version 6.0.0.0 → 10 seconds
interesting...
I see the slowdown in 5.4.1.x but you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #8 from Telesto ---
I can confirm a slow down:
Version: 5.4.0.3 -> 4 seconds
Version 6.0.0.0 → 10 seconds
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||perf
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Master |5.4.0.3 rc
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #5 from tommy27 ---
(In reply to tommy27 from comment #4)
>
> retested on the same Win8.1 x64 machine as in comment 2.
>
>
>
> LibO 5.3.4 --> 8 seconds to load
>
> LibO 6.0.0 * --> 8 seconds to load
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ba...@quipo.it
88 matches
Mail list logo