https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eyal...@technion.ac.il
--- Comment #
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #14 from Karsten ---
An option scroll behaviour with 3 choices would solve the problem:
* keyboard (as read from desktop system)
* on (permanent on)
* off (permanent off)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #13 from Eike Rathke ---
Availabilty still doesn't tell anything about whether it behaves as expected or
is unexpectedly abused by some Window manager or other means as an LED
indicator activating the lock.
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #12 from Heiko Tietze ---
Would be nice if the option gets predefined depending on the system capability
whether scroll lock is available or not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #11 from kol...@numericable.fr ---
This is not the disturbing of a normal feature: some people assigned a feature
to the Scroll Lock key because of a bug in X11 and Wayland which prevents the
key from working as expected. The
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #10 from Norbert X ---
Scroll Lock option is needed.
(see my comment 8 at bug 111627 -
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111627#c8 for details).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|103238 |113943
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #9 from Sergey ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> (In reply to Sergey from comment #7)
> > So I don't see why LibreOffice should make its default configuration
> > conflicting
> > with all these systems.
>
> Wh
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |needsDevEval
CC|l
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
Sergey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seregaxvm.m...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.4.1.2 release |5.3.0.3 release
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
Dmitry changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.3.0.3 release |5.4.1.2 release
--- Comment #6 from Dmi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #5 from Shay G ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> What I understand is that Shay wants to reconfigure the shortcut. For other
> functions that's done via tools > customize (greatly improved for 6.0) where
> .uno:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
What I understand is that Shay wants to reconfigure the shortcut. For other
functions that's done via tools > customize (greatly improved for 6.0) where
.uno:ScrollLock should be bound to .key:ScrollLo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #3 from erbe ---
Hi,
I would say, to keep it simple, the option shall be enabled by default (like in
MS Excel) in all distributions - if needed a user could disable it somewhere in
configuration - and for this we would need a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
--- Comment #2 from Shay G ---
In debian, in a multi language config it should be disabled by default as
debian uses scroll lock like this by default. On other distros it shouldn't.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112876
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|filter:ods |needsUXEval
Status|UNCO
17 matches
Mail list logo
