https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #21 from Thorsten Behrens (CIB) ---
The content of attachment 141994 has been deleted for the following reason:
Unclear provenance
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #20 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) ---
Created attachment 141994
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=141994&action=edit
din-light.ttf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #19 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) ---
(In reply to Maxim Monastirsky from comment #18)
> (In reply to Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) from comment #0)
> > You can download the affected font "Din Light" from here:
> > https://www.dafontfr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #18 from Maxim Monastirsky ---
(In reply to Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) from comment #0)
> You can download the affected font "Din Light" from here:
> https://www.dafontfree.net/freefonts-din-f59477.htm
Obviously this isn't the rig
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #17 from Thorsten Behrens (CIB) ---
(In reply to Adolfo Jayme from comment #16)
> There you go, the font is buggy.
As we do for other broken stuff (Office, documents, APIs), we tend to work
around things if it benefits our us
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #16 from Adolfo Jayme ---
As a test, I’ve dropped that (pirated copy) font into FontBakery’s checker. It
returned, e.g.,
> com.google.fonts/check/042 Checking OS/2 Metrics match hhea Metrics.
> FAIL OS/2 sTypoAscender and hh
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #15 from LibreTraining ---
(In reply to Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) from comment #8)
> (In reply to LibreTraining from comment #6)
> > (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #5)
> > > Not a regression. The font metrics are odd; b
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bibisected, bisected,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfou
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #13 from Thorsten Behrens (CIB) ---
Difference in LibreOffice font table parser vs. the Windows GDI one - not a
good thing.
Perhaps related: bug 117411
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
Thorsten Behrens (CIB) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #12 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) ---
For reference, this is (was) my attempt to fix this:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/51782/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
--- Comment #11 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) ---
(In reply to raal from comment #10)
> no repro with Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha0+
> Build ID: 3102b8c8b52845ca4584579a7ad2154488943855
> CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.4; UI render: default; VCL: x1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
raal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@post.cz
--- Comment #10 from raal -
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116498
Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Win metrics not considered |Wrong font metrics with
17 matches
Mail list logo
