https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #23 from cson...@halmai.hu ---
This is the approach GIMP also uses. I use it on a daily basis, yet, I don't
like it.
If you want to be absolutely correct then you need to move almost everything
from Save to Export.
In
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #22 from Telesto ---
Not sure if this is the right place, but please consider to arrange save as/
export file format order (even if choose option 4)
Say the most used on top and they less used lower. I always have kind of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #21 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Mihkel Tõnnov from comment #20)
> Well, there is a warning when saving as non-ODF...
And a checkbox to disable that dialog and people are really forgetful. And
export working pretty well 80%
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #20 from Mihkel Tõnnov ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #16)
> Option 0:
> Keep as it is under the assumption (expert) users are familiar with the
> organization.
+0.8
My personal preference, but maybe not the best
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #19 from V Stuart Foote ---
Hmm, have to say it is appealing to do Option #1 and follow the GIMP model.
Clean and simple--if it is not ODF it is not native! Save-as only ODF. Flip a
coin about SVG and CSV (various
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Lendo ---
+1 for Option 4 or (second class) Option 3, mentioned in comment 16.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #17 from Telesto ---
Original vision: 1 next 5 (based on MacOS Pages)
Directly saving new documents into DOCX/DOC is unadvised and people shouldn't
do that. This certainly doesn't work out to well. And having it under Save As
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #16 from Heiko Tietze ---
v7 on Linux (list depends on OS and build)
Draw
SaveAs: odg, otg, fodg
Export: x/html, pdf, svg, various raster formats
Impress
SaveAs: odp, otp, fodp, uop, various MSO Impress formats (pptx...)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #15
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Lendo ---
We cannot be so 'clear' as GIMP is as users are used to save their documents in
different formats also from other office suites. I would say we should only
save formats we
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #13 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #12)
> (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #11)
> > That would mean, you will remove the entire Write/Web module?
>
> I don't
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #12 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #11)
> That would mean, you will remove the entire Write/Web module?
I don't want to see HTML generated with LibreOffice (or similar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #11 from Regina Henschel ---
That would mean, you will remove the entire Write/Web module?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||85811
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #8 from tagezi ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #7)
> (In reply to tagezi from comment #6)
>
> This is hilarious. Could you please describe which logical syllogism allows
> to conclude
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #7 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to tagezi from comment #6)
This is hilarious. Could you please describe which logical syllogism allows to
conclude that from the said? Otherwise I take those
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #6 from tagezi ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #5)
> (In reply to tagezi from comment #4)
> You may take over this area of code, and implement missing bits.
Does this mean that the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to tagezi from comment #4)
This is a wrong point of view.
I think not about developers now, but abut users. Let's call us a super-duper
HTML editor. Will this do
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #4 from tagezi ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #3)
> As far as there is developers' consensus, we don't aim to support
> fully-featured HTML editor, so we should not make this impression
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
--- Comment #3 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #2)
> LibreOffice is an HTML editor. The quality is poor, because no one has cared
> for it for several years. But nevertheless it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
Regina Henschel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116703
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
27 matches
Mail list logo