https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #54 from QA Administrators ---
Dear jorojmaqui,
Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.
Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #53 from QA Administrators ---
Dear jorojmaqui,
This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #52 from Julien Nabet ---
jorojmaqui: any update with LO 6.3.5 or LO 6.4.3 + brand new LO profile (see
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile#Windows) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #51 from Commit Notification
---
Mike Kaganski committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/8402cd6974bf4dc6318bda39298ac1b56f1923f7%5E%21
tdf#121092:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #50 from Commit Notification
---
Mike Kaganski committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/fde00c42b169d80c9fe850d4876a0d0e5d6744a6%5E%21
tdf#121092: save
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #49 from Commit Notification
---
Mike Kaganski committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/87b44efa2a21279d22a3350b3a3d497284621d52%5E%21
tdf#121092: save
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #48 from Commit Notification
---
Mike Kaganski committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/f8eef913a33b24ce6d9c6e37fdcc2614ab823659%5E%21
tdf#121092: save
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #47 from Mike Kaganski ---
Settings other than
* Use SQL92 naming constraints
* End text lines with CR+LF
* Respect the result set type from the database driver
were not handled in the above patch, and still need
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #46 from Commit Notification
---
Julien Nabet committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/f33eb08a2b74e5de033af9b5f5283b220ac58ded%5E%21
tdf#121092:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:6.3.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #45 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #44)
> but please note that that list corresponds
> with what is written to ODB's content.xml as db:driver-settings element's
> attributes, as opposed to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #44 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #43)
> I also noticed that:
> 487 void ODBExport::exportApplicationConnectionSettings(const
> TSettingsMap& _aSettings)
> 488 {
> 489 const
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #43 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #42)
...
> (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #32)
> > Lionel: should I submit a patch with false following comments 25 and 26
>
> Julien: please do!
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #42 from Mike Kaganski ---
And indeed, *exchanging* the two defaults for RespectDriverResultSetType - in
ODatabaseModelImpl::getDefaultDataSourceSettings and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #41 from Mike Kaganski ---
And in the change, it's likely a good thing to add a comment there that the
settings must be aligned with each other - so that other devs would be aware of
this situation in the future.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #40 from Mike Kaganski ---
I have setup a testing data connection, and tested myself.
I need to note that bibisect from comment 30 is indeed incorrect (though looks
amazingly relevant wrt affected files ;-D).
And the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #39 from Mike Kaganski ---
For reference: testing with setting all checkboxes in Advanced Settings dialog
then reloading; and unsetting all checkboxes in the dialog then reloading,
shows that the following settings are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #38 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #36)
>
> -
> -true
> +
> +0
>
>
>
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
>
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #37 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #36)
I don't think that that patch should be reverted; only that something is
missing (possibly some code checks types strictly, and fails now not getting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #36 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #35)
> ...
Taking a look at
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=6de679cca6978694bacf5322c9ab8559740f0443
from comment 30, I see 4 files
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #35 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #34)
Could you please check if reverting your commit referenced in comment 30 also
has an impact (checking if the options are actually saved and persist over
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #34 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #33)
> (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #32)
> > Lionel: should I submit a patch with false following comments 25 and 26 even
> > if it's just a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #33 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #32)
> Lionel: should I submit a patch with false following comments 25 and 26 even
> if it's just a workaround?
Then those connections that rely on that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #32 from Julien Nabet ---
Lionel: should I submit a patch with false following comments 25 and 26 even if
it's just a workaround?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #31 from Mike Kaganski ---
And it was backported to 6-1 in
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/plugins/gitiles/core/+/8d0f2c5192d2c6bc18e406906825c0889e1edc22,
which was included exactly in 6.1.3.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #30 from Mike Kaganski ---
A bibisect by user mentioned in comment 17 gives this:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/plugins/gitiles/core/+/6de679cca6978694bacf5322c9ab8559740f0443
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #29 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
I think the values that the XML saving/parsing code considers are the default
(which I'm pretty sure is a global hard-coded thing, not taken from the
per-driver xcu config file!) are not saved
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #28 from Mike Kaganski ---
Setting default to true or false looks like a workaround. The real problem is
that the setting(s) apparently are not saved to or read from ODB, so a default
is used after the reload. And that is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #27 from Alex Thurgood ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #26)
> Then I applied what Lionel indicated and put false
> odbc\org\openoffice\Office\DataAccess for RespectDriverResultSetType values
> both in Features
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #26 from Julien Nabet ---
On Win10 + Cywin 3.01 + master sources updated today and enable-dbgutil + odbc
sqlite driver Devart (trial), I could reproduce the pb.
When opening file, the option "Respect the resultset..." is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #25 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
Can someone try to change the "true" default added in
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=3208fcb3a36d75d6290d9c548430682f153b09db
to a "false" default? That might solve
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lio...@mamane.lu
--- Comment #24
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #23 from Alex Thurgood ---
However, it may be worthwhile bearing in mind why this change came about, cf.
bug 119743
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #22 from Alex Thurgood ---
+
+
+true
+
+
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #20 from Alex Thurgood ---
Any chance it is linked to :
commit d6fce54c82868b82bd6fa190db6047d69bbb3ecf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bibisectRequest, regression
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #18 from Mike Kaganski ---
The research described in comment 17 was performed using Windows hosts and
server.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #16 from jorojma...@gmail.com ---
Comment on attachment 149646
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=149646
error01
windows home 10
libreoffice 6.2.1
sqlite3 odbc on libreoffice Base
error:
Hay un
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #15 from jorojma...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 149646
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=149646=edit
error01
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
--- Comment #14 from Alex Thurgood ---
It may be that these options are no longer taken into account because LO
currently seems incapable of reading the metadata of a sqlite3 db over ODBC,
see bug 120695.
As it was, previously, there
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121092
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Libreoffice 6.1.3.2 does|Libreoffice 6.1.3.2 does
47 matches
Mail list logo
