https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #31 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Thierry Menigoz,
Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.
Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #30 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Thierry Menigoz,
This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #29 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Lionel Elie Mamane from comment #26)
> ...
> The backtrace looks like a crash in the deletion of m_pRowStatusArray.
> Weird, unless the ODBC driver takes ownership of the pointer when we
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #28 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
Thierry, could you try without the "force WCHAR" option in the driver?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #27 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
The backtrace looks like a crash in the deletion of m_pRowStatusArray. Weird,
unless the ODBC driver takes ownership of the pointer when we pass it... which
would be *really* unexpected.
--
Yo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #26 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
For the "optional feature not implemented", does the button "more" on the error
message give any more information?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #25 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Lionel Elie Mamane from comment #24)
> So, if I skimmed correctly, this bug is not anymore about "optional feature
> not implemented", but about a crash when getting "a lof of data" now?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #24 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
So, if I skimmed correctly, this bug is not anymore about "optional feature not
implemented", but about a crash when getting "a lof of data" now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lio...@mamane.lu
See Al
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #22 from Jul
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #21 from Julien Nabet ---
Created attachment 160021
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=160021&action=edit
bt Windows (windbg)
Here's a bt when trying to close table.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #20 from Julien Nabet ---
On Win10 64 bits with master sources updated today, I could open an Oracle DB
with ODBC.
I installed "Oracle Instant Client Basic"
+ pack "ODBC Oracle Instant Client"
Here extra steps I did:
- unpac
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #19 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Thierry Menigoz from comment #18)
> ...
> Regarding a possible build, I had a quick look into the link you provided
> and this looks a process a bit beyond my own capabilities ...
It's mo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #18 from Thierry Menigoz ---
I do have Linux machine but at home and not connected to the Oracle System at
my work. So, I cannot give it a try :(
Regarding a possible build, I had a quick look into the link you provided and
t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #17 from Julien Nabet ---
Thierry: do you have a machine on Linux to give it a try?
If not, ideally, it could be useful to build sources with debug
(enable-dbgutil) see
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Building
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #16 from Thierry Menigoz ---
>From my experience, the 32-bit driver works again with the 32-bit LibO since
release of 6.3.
The point is that, when extracting a big amount of data (i.e. more that 1
lines or so), LibO 6.3 or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #15 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Johan from comment #14)
> > > By default we're using the 64 bit ODBC driver with LO 64 bit.
> > Does this config work?
> No, see above comment. On LO 5.4.7.2 64 bit this works. Since LO 6
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #14 from Johan ---
> > By default we're using the 64 bit ODBC driver with LO 64 bit.
> Does this config work?
No, see above comment. On LO 5.4.7.2 64 bit this works. Since LO 6 64 bit it
doesn't work.
> What about if in this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #13 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Johan from comment #12)
> (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #11)
> > What about using a 64 bit driver with LO 64 bits?
> > If there's no 64 bits driver, only 32 bits, it's expected t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #12 from Johan ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #11)
> What about using a 64 bit driver with LO 64 bits?
> If there's no 64 bits driver, only 32 bits, it's expected to require LO 32
> bits.
By default we're using th
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #11 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Johan from comment #10)
> It be great if a real solution could be provided instead of the workaround
> to install 32 bit LO. I have multiple users with 64 bit LO installed who
> can't ope
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #10 from Johan ---
It be great if a real solution could be provided instead of the workaround to
install 32 bit LO. I have multiple users with 64 bit LO installed who can't
open dashboards in Base / Calc anymore due to this is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
Johan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
Robert Großkopf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
Thierry Menigoz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCON
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #7 from Thierry Menigoz ---
I did a fresh install of version 6.2.2.2 and still get the same error # HYC00 -
[Oracle][ODBC]Optional feature not implemented.
As before, list of Oracle Schemes, Tables or Views is displayed but e
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #6 from Thierry Menigoz ---
Dear Xisco,
I recently installed in parallel Version 6.2.2.1 and bug is still present in
this version.
I will try with version 6.2.2.2 when available and keep you posted.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.2.0.2 rc |6.1.3.2 release
Whiteboar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #3 from Thierry Menigoz ---
Sorry, my mistake, last updates were 6.2.0.1 & 6.2.0.2 :(
I downgraded to version 6.1.2.1 from my original sources refreshing to a new
User Profile through the FailSafe menu and I confirm that I ha
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr
--- Comment #
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779
--- Comment #1 from Thierry Menigoz ---
Created attachment 148386
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=148386&action=edit
Screen captures of Oracle ODBC Driver parameters
I forgot to highlight that, for compatibili
34 matches
Mail list logo
