https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
خالد حسني changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Hemm ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #16)
I understand. It doesn’t make sense to implement this with another tab, if
there is more than one possible 'font' choice. Than this is off the table.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #16 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Tobias Hemm from comment #15)
> ...
> I don’t understand your constant relating this enhancement suggestion to the
> font effects. If Heiko wants to have a linking of these two things,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Hemm ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #13)
> The Character dialog 'Font effects' vs font OT/Graphite smart font attributes
> exposed
> in the 'Features...' dialog are completely different
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #13 from V Stuart Foote ---
The Character dialog 'Font effects' vs font OT/Graphite smart font attributes
exposed in the 'Features...' dialog are completely different implementations.
The font effects are available to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Hemm ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11)
We are running in circles, Heiko. What you are afraid of is already reality,
because both kinds of Small Caps are already implemented at the moment – in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Tobias Hemm from comment #10)
> These two features have a clearly different effect, since these
> two kinds of small caps look absolutely different.
But whether it's simulated or not
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Hemm ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #9)
> Reality is that the vast majority of fonts have limited support for OpenType
> (even fewer with Graphite) smart font features. Meaning the VCL font
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Tobias Hemm from comment #8)
>...
> If you mean the feature "Hidden" from the tab "Font Effects": I don’t care
> what happens to it. I can’t imagine what one would need it for. And it’s
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Hemm ---
I think I understood you now, Heiko. Is the following what you meant?
> Alternatively I could imagine a layout similar to the "area fill" dialog,
> with buttons that switch between independent
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Hemm ---
> ... to improve the usability I suggest to show icons of the effect next to
> the option.
That’s a nice idea, Heiko. I would nevertheless add tooltips on mouse hover,
since icons are not always
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Tobias Hemm from comment #5)
>> But "hidden", to pick just one option from the standard font, wouldn't be
>> available
> I don’t understand what you mean.
If the two sets are made
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Hemm ---
Thanks for your quick replies!
@Stuart: You are right, what was said in bug 58941 is basically what I wanted.
There are many great suggestions. I didn’t find that report when I was
searching. And
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|heiko.tietze@documentfounda |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129219
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dr.khaled.ho...@gmail.com,
16 matches
Mail list logo