https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:6.5.0 target:7.1.0 |target:6.5.0 target:7.1.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #26 from Commit Notification
---
Mike Kaganski committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-7-1":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/80d111c948d1553e9e0015738289b471cfe137f1
tdf#141970
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #25 from Commit Notification
---
Mike Kaganski committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/aa096331ba468f19951e43e2550105d4dcf50053
tdf#141970 Revert
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #24 from Mike Kaganski ---
FTR: As expected, there is a downside of the change in comment 8 (see comment
20 "I can't be sure that the change would not introduce a regression for
similar cases where it used to give better
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
b. changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #23 from Commit Notification
---
Xisco Fauli committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/6fdff333560e625b7c5c4dd9053c9945a45a52d1
tdf#129606: sc_ucalc:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:6.5.0 target:7.1.0 |target:6.5.0 target:7.1.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||that.man.co...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #21 from b. ---
OT for the problem, but might be helpful to understand floats:
c#05: "Also worth mentioning that "15.95" from Wikipedia might be misleading.
For any number with decimal representation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #20 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #19)
So I decided to make this change, that *seems* reasonable. However, I can't be
sure that the change would not introduce a regression for similar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #19 from Commit Notification
---
Mike Kaganski committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/d5ebe7c3089ab9f4d3fe0707169fc1ce024cdb70
tdf#129606: Round the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:6.5.0|target:6.5.0 target:7.1.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #18 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #16)
> for unclear reason, the 6.7 isn't stored as 6.7998, but as
> 6.7989. This is an own bug.
Ah no, it was me confusing myself. I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #17 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #16)
> for unclear reason, the 6.7
6.8 was meant, naturally.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #16 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to b. from comment #15)
> 1.:
new bug
for unclear reason, the 6.7 isn't stored as 6.7998, but as
6.7989. This is an own bug.
> 2.:
forget about decimal math
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #15 from b. ---
again i stumbled over a simple dragfill problem, (or two?),
1.:
B3: 6,9
B4: 6,8
select both cells and dragfill down, numbers like 6,29 starting in
B9, (visible in the input line or when
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #14 from b. ---
opened new bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130221
for the '=(1234+0,12)-1234' issue and question for IEEE format,
issue from comment#7:
=0.1*60-> 6,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #13 from b. ---
sorry, looks as if my red marks are lost in transition, cells B4, B7, B10, B13
and B16 are affected.
b.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #12 from b. ---
Created attachment 157434
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=157434=edit
129606_testsheet1_ori.ods, a sample with leftover floating point irritations
hello @Mike,
i couldn't find a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #11 from b. ---
@Mike:
YES!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #10 from Mike Kaganski ---
It's very difficult to discuss anything with an ignorant person refusing to
learn and Gish-galloping all the time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #9 from b. ---
> And now change your example:
> =0.1*60
> =(1.1-1.0)*60
exactly! that fails (in 6.1) and I had wondered about such 'irritating'
behavior years ago - at ask? - and was dismissed with 'learn floating point
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:6.5.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #8 from Commit Notification
---
Mike Kaganski committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/8f46501233c164ff91d77a7f5adf74ea16cd0165
tdf#129606: limit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #7 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to b. from comment #6)
> - it's likely ~0.10001 - with a dot,
Yes, I forgot to replace my local comma with a dot (that I usually do for
convenience of others, to settle with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #6 from b. ---
Created attachment 156935
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=156935=edit
IEEE 754 values handeled in calc
hello @Mike,
happy new year,
i already admitted that my comment may be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski ---
FTR: the assumptions in comment 4 have nothing to do with reality. Both fill
series dialog and drag-fill use the same method of multiplying the increment by
number of steps. The difference between
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
b. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||newbie...@gmx.de
--- Comment #4 from b.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
--- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski ---
Interestingly, Excel also shows same effect - just starting on
6.51, not on 5.41.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129606
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
34 matches
Mail list logo
