https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|116968 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||116968
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Robert Großkopf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||154426
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Robert Großkopf changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
--- Comment #10 from mhonline ---
the concept of having no record-numbers "available for users" in firebird is
weak, althought they need to have them, since they can establish
table-relations. However, the proposal of robert might not wor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Robert Großkopf changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
--- Comment #9 from Robert Großkopf ---
New idea, because it isn't possible to switch a field to autoincrement in
Firebird 3 (and also Firebird 4):
Couldn't we add the possibility to set autoincremented field in the wizard for
importing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
--- Comment #8 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to mhonline from comment #7)
> dropping support of firebird within LO might be a good idea.
> Non working and no developement on their site visable (last FB 4.0Beta is 15
> month old, ODBC 3
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
--- Comment #7 from mhonline ---
dropping support of firebird within LO might be a good idea.
Non working and no developement on their site visable (last FB 4.0Beta is 15
month old, ODBC 3 Year, all new stuff around FB JAVA-based only)
m.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||51780
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
--- Comment #6 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Robert Großkopf from comment #5)
> ...
> We could
> - change the wizard to choose the possibility to set AutoIncrement while
> importing rows, which has already a value in the field. The G
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
--- Comment #5 from Robert Großkopf ---
Autoincrement isn't supported by Firebird at all.
There is a special generator created for.
But when we want to change from HSQLDB to Firebird the working internal
database should offer this in ano
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
--- Comment #3 from Robert Großkopf ---
Difference to HSQLDB:
The wizard is the same.
The key could be set, but no AutoValue.
But in HSQLDB you could change the table afterwards.
You could set the AutoValue in the tableeditor without any
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr
Ever conf
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130345
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
17 matches
Mail list logo
