https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140751
--- Comment #7 from nutka ---
(In reply to Uwe Auer from comment #5)
> (In reply to nutka from comment #3)
> > I don't think it's a bug.
> >
> > If you expect your formula to have |...|_dB
> > it has to be written as follows:
> >
> > {
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140751
registrier...@julrob.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resol
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140751
--- Comment #5 from Uwe Auer ---
(In reply to nutka from comment #3)
> I don't think it's a bug.
>
> If you expect your formula to have |...|_dB
> it has to be written as follows:
>
> { abs{ G_O(j %omega) } }_dB
>
Of course this is wo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140751
--- Comment #4 from nutka ---
Created attachment 170176
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170176&action=edit
Formula: original and amended
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140751
--- Comment #3 from nutka ---
I don't think it's a bug.
If you expect your formula to have |...|_dB
it has to be written as follows:
{ abs{ G_O(j %omega) } }_dB
See the attached image.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140751
--- Comment #2 from registrier...@julrob.com ---
*Sorry, the sentence in "more information" has been interrupted*
Additional Info:
I don't know whether the bug also occurs with other operators than the absolute
value.
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140751
registrier...@julrob.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||registrier...@julrob.co
