https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143038
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |jl...@mail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143038
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0.2.2 release |unspecified
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143038
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wf...@online.de
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143038
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143038
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143038
--- Comment #3 from Radish ---
I agree with the suggestion being made however I would like the naming scheme
to be of the form WhateverFilename.odt.bak (and so forth). Using this type of
naming scheme also gets around a potential problem
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143038
--- Comment #2 from cartonjes...@gmail.com ---
TEST_ods.BAK or TEST.ODS.BAK seems fine to me, if the second does not give
problems, it will always be easier to edit.
Regarding the limit of the name ... imagine that with locks included it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143038
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
