https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
--- Comment #13 from Rafael Lima ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #12)
> *** Bug 149682 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
FTR the enhancement request in bug 149682 marked as duplicate of this one is
about a differ
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
Rafael Lima changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com
--- C
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
--- Comment #11 from Caolán McNamara ---
FWIW bsh/js are very obscure IMO, there is a recent suggestion listed in the
ESC minutes wrt removing that from the default install and moving them into an
extension
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
--- Comment #9 from Leslie ---
I am in favour of changing the way the Object Catalog behaves.
In fact the best thing would be if the Object Catalog persisted in all cases.
It should never act on its own opening and closing sub folders.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||97639
--- Comment #8 from Heiko T
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
--- Comment #7 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (allotropia)
---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> By default we show the Object Catalog left of the editor. Is this sufficient?
Works for Basic, but not for Beanshell for example :)
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze ---
By default we show the Object Catalog left of the editor. Is this sufficient?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
--- Comment #5 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (allotropia)
---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> Tools > Macro > Organize > Basic shows the organizer with a large tree with
> shipped macros. Select for example Gimmicks > Autotext and E
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
Samuel Mehrbrodt (allotropia) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-ad
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
--- Comment #3 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (allotropia)
---
(In reply to Caolán McNamara from comment #2)
> I'm added on cc here, and reference made to bug 126828 /
> https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/
> cac8694feab1ccb422294ed3e2f8b682e
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
--- Comment #2 from Caolán McNamara ---
I'm added on cc here, and reference made to bug 126828 /
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/cac8694feab1ccb422294ed3e2f8b682e15835fb
but this is not a regression from that commit, right? In oth
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
Samuel Mehrbrodt (allotropia) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.docu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
--- Comment #1 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (allotropia)
---
This was changed in bug 126828 /
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/cac8694feab1ccb422294ed3e2f8b682e15835fb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145848
Samuel Mehrbrodt (allotropia) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
17 matches
Mail list logo
