https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #17 from Commit Notification
---
Andreas Heinisch committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-7-3":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/1a343e3168c6ac8acf3279307275727e588ddcb7
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:7.4.0|target:7.4.0 target:7.3.1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #16 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Andreas Heinisch from comment #15)
> Tried to add a test case but I can't recreate the error on a smaller scale.
> Somehow in the assignment (_CheckArgument = False) the literal gets an
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Heinisch ---
Tried to add a test case but I can't recreate the error on a smaller scale.
Somehow in the assignment (_CheckArgument = False) the literal gets an empty
parameter info and then it will overwrite
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #14 from Commit Notification
---
Andreas Heinisch committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/d8428094c7f8b186b37c76fd7e9508a075424f80
tdf#144353,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:7.4.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Heinisch ---
Like Miklos pointed out in [1] (especially on slide 4) it is not easy to solve
something "trivial" like the optionals which continue to give me headaches :)
However, in [2] we could only copy
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Heinisch ---
Since it works with 7.2.4.1 the culprit is not tdf#136143. However, I think it
is a regression from tdf#144353 (Assigning a missing optional variable to a
property does not trigger "argument is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #11 from Jean-Pierre Ledure ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #4)
> (In reply to Robert Großkopf from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #2)
> > >
> > > Did I miss something?
> >
> > Could be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #10 from Jean-Pierre Ledure ---
(In reply to Robert Großkopf from comment #1)
> Could confirm BaseDocumenter doesn't document internal Firebird databases.
> Works only with HSQLDB.
>
> Documenting Firebird database quits
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #9 from Mike Kaganski ---
Revert shows the same problem, so it's not the parentheses. Possibly it's
access to pvValid, that somehow gets wrong index - StepPARAM tries to access
param with index 4, which is (having indices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #8 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #7)
I actually suspect that standalone parentheses around 'VarType(pvValid) =
vbError' are somehow confused by Basic as current function's (_CheckArgument)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #7 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #5)
Debugging _CheckArgument in Basic IDE, I see that *before* the initial
assignment '_CheckArgument = False', all the arguments show in the IDE's
tooltip
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Heinisch ---
Have to investigate further, but in the function TraceError I get the error
message "Argument is not optional" raised at:
Public Function _CheckArgument
...
bValidIsMissing = (
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
--- Comment #3 from Robert Großkopf ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #2)
>
> Did I miss something?
Could be you got an extension called basedocumenter.oxt. Seems it must be
written BaseDocumenter.oxt. Another bug?
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146281
Robert Großkopf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Hardware|x86
19 matches
Mail list logo
