https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
Rafael Lima changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #13 from m.a.riosv ---
Hi @andhy, you have opened it, so if you think the best it's close it, then do
it, don't hesitate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #12 from andhy ---
Well, about multi-threading option, it already enabled since the beginning. I
forgot when it enabled exactly, because I already use LO since ver.5. So far I
have not much problems.
The current problem only
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry INEC ---
that is a multi-thread island in otherwise single-thread sea
otherwise, while can you not be editing file B while saving file A ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #10 from m.a.riosv ---
(In reply to Dmitry INEC from comment #9)
> ..
>
> Yes, it is typical single-thread design. It is much simpler to both develop
> and to run, so it was natural choice for old computers.
>
> ..
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry INEC ---
it is not about outright "failure"
it is about being able to fully process that OS message before human notices
the delay and presses again
what specifically might slow down things in unlucky moment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #8 from andhy ---
Well, I am pretty certain that it is not caused by hardware failure.
I have 500GB SSD and 1 TB HDD (plenty of room), 20 GB RAM, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
with AMD Radeon Vega Mobile Graphics, and it is ok for a lot o
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry INEC ---
i can kind of confirm...
i was confused by the button just ignoring all users actions ( #147868 )
then i finally successfully googled for it and found the reason.
The workbook itself is small, but ha
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #6 from m.a.riosv ---
Can't it be a hardware failure?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|NEEDINF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #5 from QA Administrators ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #4 from andhy ---
Thanks for the response, Miguel.
I am sorry for my un-familiarity with this bug reporting method.
I am still looking for the origin of the problems from certain files that make
strange behavior. It does not a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #3 from m.a.riosv ---
No problem here clicking on'+', only one sheet it's created.
Version: 7.2.6.1 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: ce99d6a58f9368279ff1495b5b367eb64343b26c
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 21390;
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
--- Comment #2 from m.a.riosv ---
Please don't use private mail, BTW I'm Miguel Ángel, not Mike.
"
From: andhy ch
Date: Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Bug 147794] Clicking "Add New Sheet" button (+) once,
continuously add new
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147794
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
16 matches
Mail list logo
