[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 --- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Note that the Redmine bug has been closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org --- Comment #

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://redmine.documentfou

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 --- Comment #7 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #6) Note that I mean that exactly about QA; I see the "(for non-releases?)" part in the title, and argue with that in mind. QA people have different level of k

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 --- Comment #6 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #5) > That's more important for developers, but less for QA The bottom line of my argument is: it is not good to add something to the information, that is pot

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 --- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #4) > Why? Why shouldn't the email include the link that Bugzilla generates, when > it sends the email? Well, that's not how bugzilla email messgaes usually w

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 --- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3) > But the linkifier doesn't work when you get email. Why? Why shouldn't the email include the link that Bugzilla generates, when it sends the email? > No

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #1) > I disagree that build date is a useful information. While dailies are > *usually* built at the date that reflects the current head, it is not so > e.g. f

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 --- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski --- See also: https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/issues/3575 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148081] Copyable version info (for non-releases?) should include build date

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081 --- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski --- I disagree that build date is a useful information. While dailies are *usually* built at the date that reflects the current head, it is not so e.g. for bibisect builds, and generally is not required t