https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #32 from ady ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #31)
> 1. We need to discuss what it's going to toggle, since we also have the
> formula indicator and the clipped-extra-text indicator.
Toggling comments is already
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #31 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to ady from comment #27)
> In comment 25 I proposed a real solution from the POV of users. It is also
> proposed as one alternative in the other topic.
Like Heiko, I also support your
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #30 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to ady from comment #25)
> Having the possibility to display/hide the comment indicator, not just
> within the Options dialog (where it currently resides), but in the menu
> and/or the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #29 from ady ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #28)
> The earlier agenda was announced on 28 Feb.
OK, TY. My bad. At any rate, UX is no longer CC'ed. My proposed alternative to
the original problem (plus the other
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #28 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to ady from comment #27)
> (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #26)
> > LO has a design mailing list in
>
> Yes, and the meeting was for the 15th according to the list.
The agenda for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #27 from ady ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #26)
> LO has a design mailing list in
Yes, and the meeting was for the 15th according to the list.
> but I assure you that in the meeting, it was stressed that we
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #26 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to ady from comment #25)
> I thought the meeting was on the 15th, next week.
LO has a design mailing list in which the session agenda is announced in
advance (hopefully a week or so in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #25 from ady ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #24)
> Created attachment 185865 [details]
> Screencast
>
> We discussed the topic in the design meeting.
>
> It's clear that zooming out is supposed to make the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #24 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 185865
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=185865=edit
Screencast
We discussed the topic in the design meeting.
It's clear that zooming out is supposed to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #23 from ady ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #22)
> (In reply to ady from comment #21)
> > > I disagree with that. On the contrary, I see it as a problem if the
> > > comment
> > > indicator does not draw your
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #22 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to ady from comment #21)
> > I disagree with that. On the contrary, I see it as a problem if the comment
> > indicator does not draw your attention.
>
> Yes, if that were to be a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #21 from ady ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #20)
> There are (at least) two usability considerations/problems regarding comment
> indications:
>
> 1. On one hand, it's a problem when comment indicators hide
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #20 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
There are (at least) two usability considerations/problems regarding comment
indications:
1. On one hand, it's a problem when comment indicators hide content.
2. On the other hand, it's a problem
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #19 from V Stuart Foote ---
Again, NO for "revert" it is appropriate to scale the marker for the comment.
It would also be appropriate to be able to toggle the markers invisible (for
comment as here, or for formula [1])
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #18 from ady ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #15)
> See also bug 97551 / https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/147914.
I don't want to keep repeating myself. For whoever didn't see it already,
please see what I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #17 from ady ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #16)
> Personally, I find the triangle marker of Heiko's patch for 7.6 and trunk to
> be much more visually appealing, and functional, than previous non-scaling
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #16 from V Stuart Foote ---
Personally, I find the triangle marker of Heiko's patch for 7.6 and trunk to be
much more visually appealing, and functional, than previous non-scaling square.
-1 for reversion.
Rather than
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #15 from Heiko Tietze ---
See also bug 97551 / https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/147914.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #14 from ady ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #12)
> My understanding of bug #91415 and the motivation for the patch was that
> zooming out makes the comment indicator overly large.
And then zooming in will reduce
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #13 from Buovjaga ---
Created attachment 185294
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=185294=edit
Mockup of contour between indicator and text
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #9)
> No idea what it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #12 from Heiko Tietze ---
My understanding of bug #91415 and the motivation for the patch was that
zooming out makes the comment indicator overly large.
Alternatively to the requested revert I can offer to make the triangle
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #11 from ady ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #10)
> Do I understand that the commit, that is asked to be reverted, does not make
> things worse or better for your use
It makes things worse, not better. And this is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #10
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #9 from Buovjaga ---
No idea what it would do for performance as it would increase graphics
calculations, but what about drawing the indicator, so there is a small buffer
of cell background where there would be contact with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze ---
How about the compromise to reduce the size by 1px? More makes it very hard to
spot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #7 from ady ---
Created attachment 185187
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=185187=edit
Four screenshots demo
(In reply to ady from comment #6)
> I could take almost any cell, with a clear visible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #6 from ady ---
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #5)
> wiggly underline also scales with the zoom level.
I am aware of that change. In the case of the comment indicator, the whole
issue is initiated by one
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||101216
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #4 from Buovjaga ---
Indeed, it's in Calc's Options - View - Comment indicator.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
--- Comment #3 from ady ---
The screenshots that I saw in irc and the one you just posted here, in the way
I am seeing them in my system, show some interference between the comment
indicator and the text. This is what the original OPs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153106
ady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||91415
--- Comment #1 from ady ---
Blocks
36 matches
Mail list logo
