https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
--- Comment #10 from Jordi ---
Has this change to disable short-circuiting already been implemented? Because
this bug report still says NEW, but when I moved my code from 7.0.5.x to
7.4.7.2 (stable release) it failed in a couple of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
--- Comment #9 from Mike Kaganski ---
Ah - thanks a lot! Indeed, the operators in Basic combine logical and bit
operators - and so, before both sides are evaluated, it's impossible to resolve
the result of expression. Hence, the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Sokolinskiy ---
Here is how Microsoft writes about it in the VBA documentation :)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Sokolinskiy ---
There are many constructs of this type (except IsMissing), for example:
If IsArray(arr) And UBound(arr) >= 1 Then
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Sokolinskiy ---
I also believe that the absence of a short circuit must be written in the
documentation. May be here:
https://help.libreoffice.org/7.6/en-US/text/sbasic/shared/0002.html?DbPAR=BASIC
?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Heinisch ---
Yep, you are correct. The huge drawback would be that code written with this
flag would not work in older versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Andreas Heinisch from comment #3)
This is exactly what is proposed in
https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/if-conditions-continue-to-be-evaluated-even-after-the-if-has-been-satisfied/89385/.
I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Heinisch ---
How about introducing a new flag like OPTION EXPLICIT? So you have legacy code
would be unaffected.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
--- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Andreas Heinisch from comment #1)
I would like to see it in Basic, but this would be an incompatible change,
breaking any possible existing code that relies on side effects of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
Olivier Hallot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153142
Andreas Heinisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreas.heini...@yahoo.de
11 matches
Mail list logo
