https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153740
--- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> Some ideas: We could use underline to identify three variants: without,
> single, double. Would be hard to understand, has no room for more
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153740
--- Comment #6 from Jim Raykowski ---
It's not difficult to examine the url name and display an icon next to the
hyperlink entry. Relevant link types I can think of are http, https, ftp, file,
#(internal) and mailto.
Code pointers:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153740
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
What is easy to realize, Jim?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153740
--- Comment #4 from Dieter ---
We should take into account, that if we follow the suggestion, other user will
ask, why we don't have differentiation for other elements (see comment 2). So
we shouldn't go the first step, if we don't want
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153740
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
Some ideas: We could use underline to identify three variants: without, single,
double. Would be hard to understand, has no room for more differentiation and
clashes with the customization.
Splitting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153740
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153740
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103030
CC|
