https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #12 from ady ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11)
> (In reply to ady from comment #10)
> > ...it is very rare for me to use relative _worksheet_ references.
>
> That's true. My proposed first toggle on/off should i
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
CC|libreoffice-u
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #10 from ady ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9)
> Hard to imagine that user toggles trough all eight states to find the right
> one. And what I miss in all the discussion is the opposite sequence starting
> from re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze ---
Hard to imagine that user toggles trough all eight states to find the right
one. And what I miss in all the discussion is the opposite sequence starting
from relative references.
The primary use case
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #8 from ady ---
> To sum-up, from the POV of final users, the resulting change should be:
>
From current: To Proposed:
> 0. $Sheet2.A1 0. $Sheet2.A1
> 1. Sheet2.$A$11. $Sheet2.$A$1
> 2. Sheet2.A$1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEva
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #7 from ady ---
(In reply to Justin L from comment #6)
> I have
> coded up your suggested sequence.
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/148516
I have no coding skills/knowledge in order to comment about it. I do thank y
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #6 from Justin L ---
(In reply to ady from comment #3)
> I cannot reproduce your sequence.
Sorry - I mis-read. I thought you said there was an existing case where your
SUGGESTION was followed.
Although I have no intention of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #5 from ady ---
(In reply to Justin L from comment #4)
> please provide the
> exact formula/steps that you are following to trigger this cycle.
Using:
Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 0484a9
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #4 from Justin L ---
(In reply to ady from comment #3)
I cannot reproduce your sequence.
If I just type in the formula area "=$Sheet1.$A$1" and then cycle with F4 I
get:
-$Sheet1.B$2 = sheet + row (aka 6)
-$Sheet1.$B2 = sheet
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #3 from ady ---
(In reply to ady from comment #2)
> BTW, the suggested cycle is also already the current cycle when editing a
> formula that was already introduced, for example by the Formula Wizard.
Sorry, I think I was not
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
--- Comment #2 from ady ---
(In reply to ady from comment #1)
> The suggestion is for the F4 cycle to work as follows:
> 0. $Sheet2.A1 < this is before pressing F4 (no change)
>
> 1. $Sheet2.$A$1
> 2. $Sheet2.A$1
> 3. $Sheet2.$A1
> 4. S
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154075
ady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Cacl's F4 absolute cycle is |Calc's F4 absolute cycle is
14 matches
Mail list logo
