https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156939
--- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
A few of points:
We discussed both kinds of fitting - height and width - in the session, hence
Heiko's quote referring also to width adjustment/fitting.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156939
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156939
--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> The label is easy to understand and we should not change it unless we do the
> same with "Fit width to text" and have good reasons to do.
But "Fit width
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156939
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
The label is easy to understand and we should not change it unless we do the
same with "Fit width to text" and have good reasons to do. I'd prefer the
enhancement (and accept a minor misleading text).
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156939
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> I'd rather make it equivalent to the width function and also shrink the text
> box height.
Changing the functionality is definitely a possibility, but it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156939
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
I'd rather make it equivalent to the width function and also shrink the text
box height.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156939
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsDevAdvice, needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156939
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda