https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
Caolán McNamara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
Caolán McNamara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
Dave Gilbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caolan.mcnamara@collabora.c
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #13 from خالد حسني ---
This is happening on Linux, so it is probably either a FontConfig issue or an
issue on how we use FontConfig, so Caolán McNamara is probably the one most
familure with this code.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #12 from Dave Gilbert ---
(In reply to خالد حسني from comment #11)
> That would explain why the font updates trigger this, since the previous
> Noto Naskh Arabic version we were bundling didn’t have any Latin glyphs,
> like
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #11 from خالد حسني ---
That would explain why the font updates trigger this, since the previous Noto
Naskh Arabic version we were bundling didn’t have any Latin glyphs, like the
system version on the broken systems.
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #10 from Dave Gilbert ---
OK, I think the problem is that LO is using it's fonts to decide which font to
use but then mmap'ing the system fonts that aren't consistent with them;
Turning on some debug, in the working one I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #9 from خالد حسني ---
I don’t know why updating a bunch of font families would affect something like
this, but the SVG files uses a generic font family name ("serif") so some form
of font fallback would be happening, and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
Dave Gilbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kha...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #7 from Dave Gilbert ---
This looks like some form of font search screwup;
My bisect comes down to (with a make clean):
19e9fe7c8c89399753ac1730e1c76378b18418bc - clean; good!
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #6 from Dave Gilbert ---
Ignore my previous bisect. I'm needing to add a 'make clean' to get a real
answer.
So,
359190cb6ae2c76356de7f9368abc849c7696415 - clean - good!
aa396ee162ee0eb223c90ab4f9bd55014cf94775
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #5 from Xisco Faulí ---
it looks like
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-September/091027.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #4 from Xisco Faulí ---
Created attachment 190447
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=190447=edit
sample file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #2 from Dave Gilbert ---
trying 359190cb6ae2c76356de7f9368abc849c7696415 - good
5127b1961b762643d47a26704556fd9b8664c6fc - bad
b9ffee3074d8eb0e95b3d8f78cb7aac10b41c279 - bad
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157939
--- Comment #1 from Dave Gilbert ---
Created attachment 190444
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=190444=edit
Screen crop of bad import
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
16 matches
Mail list logo
